Am I the only one who saw the original photo and took it for what it was: mild surprise at seeing a woman with a highly uncommon amount of facial hair?

The author here says "The mind of european_douchebag was SO INCREDIBLY BLOWN by the fact that women have hair on their bodies"—but this instance very obviously isn't…

Well, halogen lights currently meet the standard, and they're incandescents. Also, I've read about some companies experimenting on the more familiar incandescents—altering the material of the filament, etching it with lasers, etc.—that achieved greater efficiency, though whether those are cost-effective are another…

Well, yeah, I get why something like this would be featured in such an article, but I don't know why anyone would need to do it in the first place. At least class it up and use keyrings or something. There's just something about wripping the tops of soda cans and using them that seems so trashy to me.

I'm sorry, but using soda can tabs? I suppose that works, but man is it tacky. Why not just hang one hanger around the neck of the other? Accomplishes the same goal and you don't have little pieces of garbage everywhere.

Just to clarify, the wingtip vortices are always there, not just upon landing.

Sigh.

The government didn't take away your right to buy bulbs, and they didn't ban incandescents from being produced. The ONLY thing they did was set an efficiency standard, which isn't even all that high. How manufacturers achieve that goal is entirely up to them, even if it's with a slightly-improved incandescent.

I…

I really hate when sites do this kind of thing. Change simply for the sake of change isn't something you should strive for.

I understand you wanted to add some features, though their usefulness is debatable. I get that, I really do. But why is that ALWAYS accompanied by a huge amount of other changes that only make…

ISDN? T1? T3? Yeah, a bit old, but then again, dial-up is on the list...

All the time! I use it as my browser's homepage. I find that I often like to search, but I also like the simplicity of the Google homepage, rather than being bombarded with articles, piles of tiles in a grid, etc. Just a simple search box and a colorful logo, sometimes with a charming picture or mini-game.

How did you come across my photo? That's awesome! :D

Maybe they were using a 3DS to get a 3D image? Most people don't have anything else capable of shooting in 3D, so that's one plausible reason...

I love my FiOS internet, but I gotta admit, I really do miss my U-verse DVR. It blows FiOS out of the water. :-(

I absolutely love this lens and the wonderful photos it takes.

You might have a point there, except for the fact that if you trace the XBOX controller line back, you find that design is also ripped off.

By "innovative controller," does that mean they're just going to ripoff Nintendo, but try to make it seem edgy and cool?

Is it really Lifehacker's fault that they announced Hive Five call for best earbuds and got overwhelming nominations for IEMs? (Even if they did use them in their article's photo...)

They may have removed the code, but they still sized everything else to make most users scroll down. I've got a respectable 1920x1200 screen, and I still have to scroll down to see it. Monitors with the required resolution aren't exactly mainstream.

I'll be honest, my first thought was "This has got to be Photoshopped, right"? Seems completely ridiculous.

You're missing the original wired Intellimouse Explorer. I really liked that mouse back in the day.

I've always been a fan of naming the workgroup for a constellation, and then the devices within that workgroup for stars in the constellation.