QMurphy
QMurphy
QMurphy

Bushmills?

Seriously with this question? The sign doesn’t mean you check the phone at the coat check. If your phone rings (or vibrates) get up from the table and take the call outside. Which is exactly what you should do even without a damn sign on the door

I noticed the feature itself late last year when a friend of mine figured it out and was predictably being a dick about it—she changed my ‘Going’ to ‘Can’t Go.’

Correct. It’s there so the host can manually change someone’s status if they speak to them.

If you have friends who are hosting something and change your status to Going when you said Can’t Go, you might need new friends. (or maybe it was a misclick!)

I would imagine that the purpose of that tool is so that the host (who presumably has other ways to communicate with the attendees such as a telephone or face to face interaction) can update the guest list when someone tells them they will or won’t attend an event. While guests can use such RSVP lists to decide whether

Sounds like you have some personal/mental issues to work out if this little feature bothers you that much. Find a new group of friends/lovers instead of sleeping around with the same group...problem solved! 

The folks who wrote the constitution had just finished fighting a war they won only because regular people already had guns. When the USMC was originally formed one of the primary requirements for being able to join was that you had your own rifle. It is just plain silly to say that they didn’t intend for normal

The Second Amendment’s wording had me thinking. It starts off as:

I don’t know about you, but I don’t decide what to eat for breakfast based on what someone thinks is overrated or underrated, but thanks for the opinion.

Is that not a conflict of privacy? (lol)

Yes, because most of LH’s readers are less interested in traveling to that “75% of the world.” Hence, they’re relegated to the link.

Is it really ignoring 75% of the world? Or is it just acknowledging that <15% of people reading Lifehacker are interested in traveling to those locations? If this is something you are going to get upset about, you probably need a job, or something else to do.

An alternate perspective in the interest of sanity:

I like to take the lobsters to a quiet and serene place and tell them about the farm we will have together and the rabbits they will get to pet and then when they are in the happy place I dispatch them

Nope. I despise the NRA and all that it has come to stand for but this will accomplish nothing but setting a dangerous precedent. For decades conservatives and evangelicals used phrases like “family friendly content” and “community standards” to pressure private companies away from hosting or distributing queer-themed

I don’t like this. While I don’t support the goals of the NRA, they don’t necessarily encourage illegal conduct (though they are a hindrance to enacting reasonable new laws that would save lives) and I don’t feel that people who want to watch NRATV should be prevented from doing so just because Amazon or Google or

Apparently it isn’t a well known problem with an easy solution because you seem to think the issue is the software rather than the actual problem of: physics working the way it does rather than the way you want. In other words, no matter what your software algorithm is, faces with high contrast are going to have have

The rich are ruining the game after the game required you to be rich to play the game? Yeah sounds about right.

What is 10 years of supervised probation going to accomplish here? Does anyone expect her to pursue a life of crime after she gets out? She had no criminal intent, just criminal stupidity.