If you look at a straight side-shot of the vehicle when it's aired out, the top of the rear wheel arches are a lot lower than the front. It's that way on a large majority of vehicles, because the front wheels need the extra space for turning.

Can't fool me...that's a Lincoln.

Its probably airbagged, so when its all the way down, the camber will be way off. At ride height, the rear wheels probably look normal. Not to say that the objective was the negative camber, the objective was the really low look and the negative camber just comes with it. I dont think anyone actually thinks that much…

Fair enough.

How is Chrysler "bringing back the shaker hood" when Ford already did that with the Mach 1 ten years ago? Or is this bringing it back from that?

Dio's Mio. It was a joke.

As they say in the Spanish-speaking world, Buenos Dios..

A 3000 pound Wrangler!? Not only does that sound kick-ass, but it seems as if it actually has a chance of making it to production (thought some time in Mopar's shops would probably be needed to reach that 3000 curb weight).

Me too. No brainier. Build it.

Buick Grand National.