Primesghost
Primesghost
Primesghost

Ah, the old argument that the writer is writing what they write because they're just trying to get clicks. Yeah, a succinct, non-histrionic headline and a bunch of reporting mixed in with argument sure are the telltale signs of a writer who doesn't give a damn about what they're saying and is just cravenly farming

Thank you for your attention to this, and your dedication. So many people are "tired of it", either because it's just not relevant to them—or maybe some rare few, because they're guilty of contributing to the problem. I do believe that change can happen for the better, and with people like you, sites like this,

Here's my humble one:

It means "no flavor."

I just wish the Transformers weren't overly detailed looking junk.

Because maybe I want to go to a LAN party without hearing the person next to me decrying that he was killed by a 'Pussy Whore Bitch'?

I'm not the type who'd go for ultra-competitive play, so hell if I know, but I saw some comments that it might be less intimidating for a first-time female competitor to join in the tournament if she knows she's not going to get rape comments, which sounds like a horrible thing to assume any of the male players would

It isn't separate, and it isn't luring. They can still compete in a mixed tournament with men, and the women's tournaments aren't about luring, they're about accessibility.

It's hard not to glorify shaming. It's only seen results in basically every case its appeared in.

I don't completely agree with the female-only events, but this is certainly a step up.

Which specific cultural, social, or economic differences make it harder or easier for a woman to know whether or not they should use Flamestrike? What, outside of America there are countries that teach little boys and only boys to put Nat Pagle in their decks?

Why does it make sense for chess to divide men and women in the first place? It's not a physical sport, no sex as an inherent advantage over another. This isn't like American football where men would have obvious biological advantages. But how the hell does any of this come into play with turn-based gaming? A woman

#NotAllDice

Uh no. This isn't an either or kind of scenario. Anyone who can afford to waste money on an amusing joke can also afford to support "genuine" projects that interest them. If they choose not to that's their prerogative, it's not up to you to decide how people should spend their money nor is it your place to decide

4 hours and nothing happened? sounds like a normal day in dayz

1080p for the PS4 version. 720p for the Xbox One version. No Wii U version because there's not a large enough install base to buy it.

THIS IS WHY ITEMS SHOULDUNT BE IN MARIO KART THERE IS NO COMPETING BECAUSE ITEM ALWAYS RANDOM AND CAN HARM YOU DESPITE SKILL AND MAKE MARIO KART NOT COMPETEATIVE ENOUGH ALSO ALL YOUR POKEMON SHOULD BE ADAMANT OR MODEST AND IF THERE NOT THERE TERRIBLE YOLO PEACE OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FINALLY, all the stupid people who think the eye can't see past 30 fps can finally shut the fuck up simply by visiting youtube gaming videos.

THE MASTER RACE SHINES TODAY BROTHERS AND SISTERS