Every attempt EA has to "copying" the success of their peers by trying to replicate them wholesale rarely pans out. Sometimes you have a game that doesn't measure up but still finds an audience (The Old Republic's bid to take Warcraft's crown), but more often than not you get something far less desirable (Dungeon…

Just another game to cash in on the MOBA success, nothing of value was lost here.

(except people's jobs if they are getting let go)

EA has been desperately trying to land another F2P success for years. They even turned the, now canceled, C&C into a LoL clone. And this is why I hope they never succeed:

And although the game has grown, we're not seeing the progress we'd hoped for...

If you had any journalistic integrity, you would be embarrassed, and you certainly wouldn't be responding with ironic distancing and sarcasm. This is not a good article and you're capable of better.

Home run? You must be kidding. They put a relatively new writer on the story to take the heat and get the clicks. Granted, it's not a badly written piece at all, but any attempt to justify molestation is not kosher in my book, ever.

Which is why you edited your piece, right? Don't worry, guys! She has a bit from Grace Dunham about how she doesn't feel it's abuse and there's a whole Tumblr now supporting Lena (like that's fucking news) so it's cool. Saying you ought to be embarrassed is the least of it. Great fucking job minimizing child abuse,…

So why should he take precedence among the avalanche of backlash against Dunham? If you search Twitter, most of the condemnation appears to be coming from women, feminists of color in particular.

You should be! You're being deliberately obtuse, but I'm not surprised. That's par for the course for liberals these days. Imagine your outrage if Lena Dunham was a conservative or better yet, a man who confessed to having done these things to his little brother or sister growing up. My God, your f-ing heads would…

then really there is no point to your article, since you also have no interest in calling her out for what she is: a narcissistic, predatory manipulator who even outed her little sister without her consent. she abused her sister well into her later teen years, and falsely accused a guy of rape for revenge. stop…

omg im so embarrassed

You should be. This article is full of disingenuous stanning for a sexual abuser, and instead of looking at the whole issue, you're doubling down and pretending like the one issue you wrote about is the only thing people are losing their shit about. Jesus Christ, who taught you how to do research?

How about you acknowledge that you made a mistake instead of being flippant towards commentators who are right?

The journalistic integrity of an author has been called into question, and true to Jezebel ethics and practices, she fires back with middle school sarcasm.

That's a healthy reaction, especially for leaving out 90% of the timeline on which this bizarre behavior occurred.

This article ignores the actual content of the controversy, though. It literally adds nothing to the conversation.

Everyone has different opinions. Being flippant about sexual abuse and leaving out giant chunks of relevant information IS embarrassing. Your snarky response is gross.

So I guess you are killing this, its a shame really

I'm not sure feeling "extremely apathetic" is acceptable here.

Except that you've preemptively dismissed her critics as 'small fedoras'. What purpose did that serve except to blunt and mute the negative reaction to her?