It's naked!

Ultima GTR, obscure enough that they had to write that one the side. Basically the minimum amount of car it takes to keep a V8 on the road.

I think mine was built in Belgium with a Swedish engine, so I went for the country it was designed in.

Many cars have this now, my Ford does. It is nice, but it is not really the same.

Early VW Beetle, it has the distinctive rear window.

Semaphore indicators.

Alternative heading:

Meanwhile that Swede in the Audi looks like he might be okay :P

The last RS was going to be AWD when it was first proposed, and there where rumours of development cars that sped away from cameramen spinning all four tires, but it came out FWD and didn't suffer for it. I get the feeling they will talk AWD and then decide it adds too much weight.

You've done fast and practical, you've done fast and impractical. So obviously you want something slow.

It wouldn't surprise me to find out that these had all been spoken for before us plebs even found out they were going to build them.

Bill Gates bought a 959 even though he could not import it into the states, of course he's a good person.

The quasi-believable explanation I heard for Red Bull's so-called secret traction control system was that on low throttle the engine would cut off fuel to four of the cylinders (which is what made the odd noise). This allowed the engine to spin faster through the corners without producing too much power. Why? …

The closer to the ground the better (except for hitting kerbs), but the minimum height is mandated in the rules, as well as how much flex is allowed. If you look at videos of the 80's cars you might notice how close the the ground they used to be.

It's not the first time the flexibility of Red Bull's wings has been brought up, although its's the first time I've heard it this year. There are rules governing this precisely to stop the front wing breaching the minimum road clearance when under load.

That's rather orderly for urban India, I'm guessing it's not Dehli as you can see the road between the vehicles.

That would make sense economically, you only pay for pilots when you need them.

I hope COMAC built the C919 to withstand the usual Ryanair landing. Ryanair are the only airline I've flown with which employs the 'bounce' method of landing a plane, either that or they skimp money on their pilots, too.

It's another case of nice car, shame about the mods. CP.

Whatever it turns out to be, a doubt it will be at muscle car prices.