Developers’ choice not to release on other platforms is different, as would be Valve’s decision to publish their own games. Not what we’re talking about.

Not familiar with it, but we’re not discussing quality of launchers, are we. We’re discussing just having them. Presuming two work well enough, it’s fine.

I have a problem with installing [...] the Blizzard launcher. Blizzard I haven’t used

I already addressed that in a previous comment. They don’t have to complain about things you want them to complain about.

People mock it for being shit but having the installer? No one cares anymore.

It really is time for you to

It isn’t like that. If you get up from your computer after reading this response and say the nastiest shit about me, do I care?

Nope. And your other response makes less sense.

They aren’t removing risk for its own sake; it comes at an overall cost. I don’t fault the developers for taking it but I would a) be very clear why I took it and say we got paid and b) turn off my Twitter feed.

No but my mother does live in my attic.

Nobody believes that having a second launcher is a problem. Origin/EA has one and people don’t complain. Blizzard has one and people don’t complain. The issue is with the business practices behind what they’re doing and the exclusive deals they have with third party developers. No one expects Valve to release Half…

Do you guys have furnished offices still or do you just sit directly on publishers’ dicks while they type for you?

Nope! Still wrong. There was no discussion to had if this is still your interpretation after repeated clarification.

Can’t trust companies period, hacks or not.

It’s been as detailed as it can. He was working on gravity stuff (sci-fi magic) and created a man-made black hole. From that, his psyche seems to have been affected so much that time and space are perceived differently. At the same time, he’s able to harness a lot of gravity stuff now. It’s psychosis but that’s a…

Irrelevant. Suspension of disbelief about robots doesn’t throw everything out. It doesn’t make portraying humans any more difficult just because there’s technology in their environment. If there’s a story about a robot and a child suffering from parental abuse and sexual abuse you wouldn’t say, “Well there’s a robot…

Right. They’re upset at the shoes issue but they’re not upset at the Sigma issue - which aren’t actual issues but this is their train of thought.

Yes. Same reason I read books and discuss them but don’t participate in speed-reading competitions.

That’s the poorest comparison you can make. You gotta wipe the tears from your eyes so you can edit what you’re posting. Tracer’s codename is in no way comparable to calling someone by their patient ID in an article bemoaning using that identity.

Portrayals don’t matter? What?