I don’t know what elephant you’re talking about, brother.
I don’t know what elephant you’re talking about, brother.
Oh man, that’s so weird. I’m actually in the process of developing a VR game about being a writer for Gawker itself.
Almost 2 decades of friendship and being in love with each other and neither one of us ever did anything about it.
I scored XCOM 2 via a third party site I got the entire deluxe bundle for $57. I didn’t really lose anything getting the DLC.
A little confusing. For one, I don’t need to justify anything to you, and those last two words to you are the operative ones. Then again, you say at the end it doesn’t matter, but still walk away in a sour mood anyway.
But even in this scenario, we’re ignoring the person who’s doing something bad and focusing on the victim (a term I use lightly here).
I’m defending the idea that we shouldn’t tilt entirely one way in a pissing contest. I support neither side. In fact, I’d rather both just go away.
You’d be surprised. I wouldn’t encourage a lawsuit. I’d rather see something more nefarious but fair play, so to say. Still, people tend to lean one way or the other, forgetting that Sterling is a massive tool in the process.
Never said it was.
And this someone is just telling them they smell bad. It’s just an observation, nothing more.
I don’t know any of their work. I won’t know any of their work since I won’t be playing their games. How does that make me an apologist?
If someone called you a massive faggot that smelled like shit, would you take it as positive criticism of your hygiene and respond with “Thank you”?
It’s also like saying, “$90,000 for a sports car? I could get a Honda for 1/5 that price!”
Or, as in my case, I’ll just take the GPU in my desktop and put it in there.
Don’t know if I’d call it an assumption, but it’s something I do when I see a YouTube video embedded in a post. You miss out on information in the description and the title.
That would be m-m-m-m-m-m-m-m-alright.
By that logic, Muse’s last album would have put them in Gitmo.
You could have done the same.
If my statements mean nothing, or my words (which is redundant, since if my words don’t mean anything why would my statements) then why did you go on to write anything else?