@horasdedia: Likewise.

@VolumePlus: I'd have voted for it.

Missing option: I'd rather not pay at all, even though ads and a little loss of privacy is ultimately not worth the savings.

@Curves: Hahaha aww.

@Curves: Also none of the gingerbread. :/

It looks like something the Syfy channel would promote, and that's not a good thing.

I see I'm not the only one who loves AwkwardFamilyPhotos.

@roach8101:

Incredible? Don't oversell it, now.

@XTOTHEL: I've been hang-drying my clothes for years, and have never, ever, experienced that. Are you starching your clothes for some reason?

@AwokeKnowing: That's still legal. As long as the photo is taken from public property, your own private property, or private property with permission.

@coolkatz321: I always hang-dry my clothes. Sometimes outside, sometimes inside; weather permitting. It saves electricity, space, and my clothes aren't as prone to shrinkage and stains as they once were when exposed to the excessive heat produced by dryers.

Normally, if someone photographs something from public property, it's fair game. You could be standing outside in your skivvies, and tough luck; that's you're problem. It's part of a photographer's rights. Why does Google Street View keep getting flak for this?

@MrFluffyThing: It's not subliminal if you're aware of the advertisement and its method of delivery.

@SquareWheel: +1

Google.

@bowen13: May He bless you with His noodley appendage.

If they really want to read them, they'll find a way. Silly authoritarian blockades be damned.

@blatanville: He's labeling the films depicted in image no. 2.

I think it's pretty safe to say the video description comparing it to a pharmaceutical ad is unfortunately off. The video is an obvious spoof of those Mormon commercials where they try to hawk their wares.