Technically an iPhone is mirrorless. However, the term "Mirrorless" is actually a short-hand for Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera (MILC). Since an iPhone does not have interchangeable lenses, it is not a "Mirrorless" (MILC) camera.

Yet another ridiculous post by Sam Biddle.

I hate Apple as much as the next guy, but their claim of showing more of the website is actually correct, despite their lower resolution. Unlike desktop browsers, mobile browsers work by zooming in on the width of the page, so it doesn't matter what the resolution of the screen is, the full width of the page will…

Isn't trademarking a musical note on the same level as trademarking a letter of the alphabet? I'm gonna trademark the colour blue, and then nobody else can use it for anything unless they pay me a royalty!

Indeed!

Cineplex Theatres app in Canada has support for Passbook (or so says their updated app description - I wouldn't know first hand, because I'm avoiding iOS 6 like the plague).

It sucks that this adapter is pretty expensive for what it is, but 1) you don't need to buy an adapter for each accessory you own, you can use the same adapter, and just take it with your phone... and 2) you don't actually have to buy the iPhone 5.

After warranty and taxes, my factory-unlocked iPhone 4S cost over $1000, so yeah.

Not only is the home button covered, but if you even able to push it, the whole iPad would slide backwards about a centimetre. Looks nice, but far from useful in any meaningful way.

Twitter has shown no capacity for designing good software. They were terrible at scaling their infrastructure to meet the daily demands of users (Fail Whale), and they have ruined the great third party apps that they acquired. From everything I've read about the work environment at Twitter, it's not a great place to…

It's better than it was before, but it's still ridiculously complicated compared to, say, Disqus. I don't understand why it's so hard to have normal, threaded, comments.

I LOL'd.

Even though I was wearing a hat and sunglasses at the salt flats, I got a crazy sun burn... On the bottom of my face. The reflection from the white salt is killer.

Considering that the 22mm kit lens would probably sell at retail for <$200 (like the 40mm 2.8 STM), and that you'd need either the other EF-M lens, or the EF adapter, it doesn't seem likely that Canon would sell this unit body only. Are there any mirrorless cameras that sell body only?

They can build awesome robotic camera rigs, but they can't upload a higher res video than 360p? WTF AP!?

There will most likely (or hopefully) be a EF to EF-M adapter, which would take care of the back-focus issues. Though, there wouldn't be too many wide angle lenses left in Canon's lineup to make it particularly useful.

You know how you can tell if you're getting an SD or HD signal? Look at your F'ing screen!