She married Ramsay as part of a plan to retake the North. The decision to marry Ramsay logically would require her having sex with him. Because Ramsay is an evil psychopath, that would necessarily take the form of a horrible rape.

And then there’s the composition of the scene, as a camera slowly closes in on Theon’s sobbing while Sansa’s painful cries are heard in the background. Not only was this habitually and emotionally tortured female character thrown into an unnecessary rape scene, she was put there to reflect the Emotional Journey of one…

SPOILERS AHEAD, but who cares! The worst thing about this scene is that there is absolutely no logical reason for it to exist. The show runners weren’t in any way bound to put Sansa’s rape on TV because it never happened in the books.

It’s a parody of Dirty Dancing. A parody where he’s rejecting her because she’s a Bulls fan and he’s a Cavs fan.

He ripped through the Bayern defense for the first goal you see above.

Must be difficult to go through life requiring that everything be literally spelled out for you, and being unable to understand things from context.

Which is why you can be ruled not guilty in a criminal case but found guilty in a civil one, because “not guilty” and “innocent” are very much not the same thing.

“John Doe is not guilty of killing the truck driver but he is also responsible.” That also sounds like a contradiction, but here we are.

By the way, this:

It’s not about the evidence standard, it is about the fact that any proceeding cannot find “innocence”, by your own explanation even.

When the standard is preponderance of the evidence, the factfinder sides with the person who they believe the evidence favors. If they believe the evidence favors the accuser, even by .0001%, they side with the accuser. If they believe the evidence favors the accused, even by .0001%, they side with the accused.*

Actually, the standard of proof in the Columbia investigations is “preponderance of the evidence,” a much less burdensome standard than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard used in criminal cases. Under a preponderance of the evidence standard, basically if 50.0001% of the evidence favors you, you win. So if…

The suit accuses Sulkowicz of filing a “false complaint” with Columbia, and says she pursued a “scheme” to “brand Paul as a rapist.” It does not mention the other three sexual assaults Nungesser was accused of, including the two that went through the campus disciplinary system and found him not responsible.

You realize that this is fucking evil, don’t you? And particularly horrendous given that it is so-called feminists who are humiliating this woman using her illegally stolen private transactions. You should be proud.

Umm, Haven Monahan isn't a real person. It's a name that Jackie made up. Did you read the story?

So I googled "Haven Monahan" and this is the first thing that came up. It contains an email purportedly written by "Haven Monahan" — in the days after the alleged rape — to the object of Jackie's affections. Forgive me if others were already aware of this, but I hadn't seen it before.

The hard drive is where Chef Kobe keeps all his best steaks!

Present-day Jalen Rose wasn't calling Laettner a bitch or a pussy. He was explaining what his 18 year old self thought of 20 year old Laettner. He wasn't saying he was right to feel that way, but how he felt about his opponent is certainly relevant information for a documentary.

Based on the responses, I feel like those of us who didn't get it just outed ourselves as Jews.

It's God's work you're doing, Drew.