When I lived in Eastern Europe, I "made a friend," who was horrified when I explained (in broken Eastern European-ese) that, "In America, we don't have these." The look on his face was akin to that if someone had said to an American, "in my country, we cut our ears off."

Because we must find some pseudo-medical reason to carry on sanctioning the mutilation of unconsenting infant boys, of course.

For every study that says something like that, there is one that says the foreskin does it's job in protecting the penis. It's a long, long running debate. It's there for a reason. To remove it in any circumstance other than an immediate health risk is genital mutilation, exactly the same as in female circumcision.…

I know you're speaking with good intentions, but on the list of reasons to circumcise/not circumcise, what a woman will thinks of the penis is solidly at the bottom.

As a woman who has only ever been with un-circumcised guys, I have always found the "he is uncircumcised, ew?" thing a little confusing. I suppose you just get used to what you know. Until I was about 17 I honestly thought that it was just a thing a minority of jewish and muslim boys had done, and then I saw the…

Oh fuck off with your smegma diatribe, you're as bad as a frat bro dissing vaginas as being fishy smelling. Grow the fuck up. You support an act that denies bodily consent. You sure have bought into the propaganda. As a European I find such exclamations entirely dubious. You know what extra precautions are taken?…

half of all uncircumcised males will, over the course of their lifetime, develop some kind of medical issue related to their foreskin.

It reads like total circumcision propaganda.

By 'extra precautions' do you mean 'showering daily'?

Well...at least....ummm...she's found a job more suited to her particular skill set? I'm trying to find something positive to say.

See, you're providing so much proof as to what you are. You're sitting there at your computer, anxiously waiting for every comment so you can spin a new poem of cunts and vitriol. That's the whole point of why you're here. You're a sadist. Unfortunately for you, people over here at Jezebel are extremely good at coping…

Why even make the comment about your supporting women being forced to carry a pregnancy? If you support her drive and ambition, why not just say that? I know why: because you like trolling.

You made that comment so that one of these "feminist nazis" would call you out and you'd have an opportunity to call her a "feminist nazi." You weren't trying to compliment the person in the article. You came here to pick a fight in order to feel like a big man.

I'm happy that you use your right to free speech to say you disagree with abortions and then call someone who disagrees with you a "feminist nazi." I think I'll use mine to call you a dick. Free speech is fun!

What you said was this: Even though I am against abortion.

Don't have one, then, if you're even capable of getting pregnant.

I am about Chelsea's age. This is what I remember about her years in the WH: The Press was horrible to her. She was the butt of mean jokes, and the word "awkward" was often used to describe her. The current media usually uses words like "sweet" and "pretty" for the Obama girls. Chelsea didn't get that. I remember…

My plan for avoiding bigots:

I'm not going to defend Obama's professorial tone, but "wrestling bears" is not a standard for leadership.