And so ends iteration 10,000 of this conversation.

Saying that allowing openly racist subreddits is bad and should change != saying all of reddit is bad or that all redditors are bad. This is the central bullshit argument of the Gawker vs. oversensitive redditors “debate.”

Y-Dub, how many articles has GM collectively written about how awful Stormfront is? Or 4chan? Breitbart? Those sites are simply terrible and everyone knows it, and it’s only worth mentioning if it comes up in relation to something else.

Because Sir Patrick Stewart is Sir Patrick Stewart, whatever cesspool he happens to be standing in at a given moment.

Marrying Stephen Ammell is winning in my book.

Reddit detectives busted Bello; his eyes are brown.

Uhhh. Because we’re afraid to anger Tyra? Next question.

When I watched the video, uncut without commentary, I interpreted her part of the dialogue as “I’m listening to your community’s suggestions as to what to do about our obvious race problem, because I don’t want to be the privileged one dictating to the oppressed group, so please give me your suggestions because I’m…

I mean I might be wrong but the fact that there were no child actors or guests sort of tells the story, vs Sesame Street.

I think I Huck’s world, Beyonce is the devil’s music. Rock music is just good ole ‘Murican music.

Because cake is fucking awesome, that's why.

Right?! To me, this as if the reporter teed up the ball for Bernie, and he swung and missed pretty badly. I could maybe see if Clinton/Palin hadn’t just faced this bullshit seven years ago, but honestly, he should’ve been able to hit that question out of the park.

Yes BUT... Bernie hears a lot more than the other male candidates about his appearance, because he’s got the nutty professor thing happening. When he first announced his candidacy, his Einsteinian hair got more attention than the fact that he’s an actual Socialist. And he’s not a man with a sense of humor when he’s…

I guess I’m in the minority here, but I thought it was a great question. Why is Hillary’s appearance scrutinized while yours isn’t? He missed an excellent opportunity to discuss the bias against women candidates and the way the media talks about their hair, their pantsuits, calls them grandmothers instead of…

to be fair, it was a dumb “buzz-y” way to make her point

I think it’s worse than that, because she seems to believe in the necessity of vaccines, but she’s pandering because it’s politically expedient.

No. Rape won’t “eventually happen” if kids are taught respect and consent and in general how to be a decent human being.

Speaking of demographic, it just occured to me why so many nerds drink crown royal.

Also remind him that the largest budget deficits grew under Reagan and George W. Bush. If you set them next to Clinton and Obama, you can clearly see that the Democrats actually shrunk the budget deficit while the Republicans exploded it in the name of “freedom” and “defense”.

A fashion designer who’s openly misogynistic and has no regard for any woman who’s not built like a 2 X 4?