Charlie Sheen is an asshole but that doesn’t mean we should feel free to suggest his HIV status is a result of his asshole (or reckless) nature (insinuating that other HIV positive people probably had it coming from being assholes too), use it as proof that he was bisexual (see the Radar report) or that women in his…

The 80s flashback is the “Sheen has it coming because HIV is what dirtbags get” tone to some of the coverage.

Don’t think about the insurance hit. Think about what it would be like to become the focus of Michelle Malkin as an example of unhinged, dangerous angry liberals.

Oh, god, Pointless gif. Yes. I love whoever has been uploading episodes to YouTube.

I reember it being a really cool magazine, for its first couple years. Then it started to look like a once-interesting magazine where all the really interesting staff/writers got hired away for being so interesting.

Give it time. We’ve got one conservative pundit who made her name on her “Those Japs had it coming” book. If an Asian-American Democrat ever becomes prominient enough to be considered a potential presidential candidate (sadly I’m having trouble thinking of potential prospects, the country is so desperately in need for…

I am saying you’re not going to learn how to be a great innovative home chef from watching Food Network anymore because it’s probably hard to convince advertisers to sponsor shows that tell people their products are unnecessary. That might be the case if food co-ops had the money to spend millions on advertising, but…

Anthony Bourdain is basically CNN’s version of Lockup. The guy in charge of CNN today used to be in charge of NBC Universal when MSNBC became the Lockup Channel on weekends.

The problem with the Food Network is that your local farmer’s market and authentic dried chipotles aren’t major advertisers. For a while if you watched, you’d see a segment how easy it is to make a vinegratte from scratch followed by an ad for Wish Bone. Last I checked, there’s a lot less Food Network programming that…

It’s been a while since I saw that episode. I’m due for a rewatch.

No, why?

you know, you can’t ask them those questions during debate, they are hard gotcha questions

So much bad news in there but I am actually thrilled about Alex Perene who, at one point, was the one writer I visited Salon to read.

I think a lot of it is that gender-role conforming gay people don’t want to be associated with those weird gender non-conforming types. The respectiable gay men in suits and the femme lesbians who took the time to do their makeup want to have their respect dragged down.

Isn’t there a new acronym that symplifies it? I keep forgetting the specifics but it’s something like Gender Relationship and Sexual Minorities (GRSM).

This talk has reminded me that I’ve been wanting to rewatch Flawless. Not a perfect film but the time PSH’s character snaps a the LCRs for wanting to erase the fem and trans part of the community so they can feel “normal” makes the entire movie for me.

Nevermind.

Houston apparently had the most well-behaved child predators. “There’s a law against it? Well, nevermind then.”

As I recall, Zooey Deschanel did a gender swapped version that was more blatant about the rapeyness.

Actually, I’d say there are probably Candy Crush players who have spent 150+ hours playing, they just probably played it in 15-30 minute incriments when they had a moment of free time. Candy Crush is great for people in positions that get inturrupted a lot like busy parents.