No, America is a common name for the United States of America. They clearly meant the United States, not THE AMERICAS, which are the two continents that form the Western Hemisphere.
No, America is a common name for the United States of America. They clearly meant the United States, not THE AMERICAS, which are the two continents that form the Western Hemisphere.
Sorry if I responded in-kind.
How does this affect those of us already with Prime?
I think you're just being overly pretentious and oversensitive.
bawawawawawawa
I'm not even White you dumb bitch; stop making assumptions.
1. IQ is considered to be highly correlated with what we Humans perceive to be intelligence, in the scientific community. Deal with it.
NO, in the scientific community.
it's the interbreeding that brings about the ultimate winner
You do know it was the same in most of the West up until the 1920's right? Hell, even up until the 1960's lighter skin was considered better (although the reasons were no longer related to being a laborer or an indoor person).
Ah yes, the typo fallacy all of you jizz-stains use as your 'winning argument'.
Social failures, like the insecure feminists on Jizzabel who use their rabid feminism as the excuse for their social conservatism and social retardation (when in reality they are just jealous that hot women put it out there, and men don't want to see you doing the same).
See? There is no point arguing with someone this out-of-touch with reality.
And yet IQ is widely held as valid in the scientific community. You are fighting against decades of research and doing so like the arrogant little twat that all scientific illiterates are.
The French always get screwed.
There are no juried publications that would support my claims because there is no genetic research done on Eugenics. Eugenics is at best, in the modern day, a social science.
Your first paragraph makes sense; it still has nothing to do with Eugenics being "scientifically wrong". If we have direct knowledge as to which alleles of which genes code for this or that specific behavioral trait, then... ta da! Eugenics is no longer "scientifically wrong".... For more scientifically-minded folk,…
No, it doesn't mean what YOU think it means. If you're stupid enough to think that scientists are publishing studies that routinely "refute" Eugenics as a tool to improve intelligence, then you yourself are a moron and shouldn't breed.. As someone who has taken the Stanford Binets, WAIS IV, and RPM, I can tell you…
Oh shit... I thought you were referring to:
Even though I am a WN I don't consider Slavs to be of my people, and find you desperate and stupid.