More of a drama than a monster/action film but a really good drama. And when the monsters do pop up they're used very effectively.

I understand where the rage is coming from. Let's face it, for many years fans were treated to 13 (+1) episodes for the year (not counting the skip year which to be fair was announced far in advance). In 2012 we got 5. So far for 2013 we're getting 10 (that have been confirmed). I think people are being anxious and…

Life on Earth is not the point of Star Trek. I don't mind the occasional look, but should not be the focus of the story. JJ Abrams has no idea what Trek is about, nor does he care. He wants money and a reputation for saving an ailing franchise. I predict that given the success of the first movie, Abrams will have even…

Because they're fucking cool.

Yeah, I really wanted to see that photo of Spock and Cumberbatch fighting again.

Because it sounds like somebody at WB put too much thought into it and as we know, "putting much thought into it" is something not done at WB.

Splitting seasons up was the worst decision they've made to date on nuWho (that and River Song). You'd think they would have learned after all the erratic scheduling in the mid-80s.

Oh don't worry Chris Pine. Your "Star Trek" movie has already made me cry.

So Russell Crowe says Man of Steel is fantastic, awesome, brilliant, different, superfabulous and fantasticriffic. And he can't wait to see it. Wow, it's almost like he's invested in the film somehow. Shut up Rusell Crowe. Just shut up.

Wow, I'm really tired of that same Star Trek photo.

Shut up Mark Millar. Just shut up.

No.

No.

Plus the last time Singer tried to jam something into established continuity we got Superman Returns which, regardless of how you feel about it as a film, was a nightmare trying to make it fit into the Superman/Superman 2 timeline. Things were ignored, characters de-aged while others aged too much (hi Jimmy!), some…

Shut up Jamie Foxx. Please, shut the fuck up.

God, shut up Jamie Foxx. Just please shut up.

Absolutely right. I feel this Trek movie will have even less to do with original Trek than the last one (in terms of tone, not content). I understand the need to glossy things up, but there's a fundamental reason Trek has survived nearly 50 years - there's a strong philosophical and moral center to the series which I…

Ummmmmm, no. The problem with the Hobbit and say, Phantom Menace, has little to do with expectations and more to do with the fact that they're not very good films. All the mixed (mixed, not 100% negative) reviews I've read about the Hobbit focus on the length and the obvious padding of the first hour, not the fact…

If that is the case, then do what they did with Liam Neeson in Batman Begins. Announce he's playing character x from the get-go and then reveal he's actually character y in the movie. But the trick is to downplay the first announcement and not draw attention to it. That's all Abrams is doing, is drawing way too much…

"make up something new" are words that Hollywood studios don't understand and, more importantly, refuse to spend money on