Superheros are not crap. Bad writers/directors/producers are crap.
Superheros are not crap. Bad writers/directors/producers are crap.
no.
The original costume was designed with aesthetics in mind. That's why it's so visually pleasing. The new one was designed in a desperate attempt to be "edgy" and "modern" with no regard at all to how it would look aesthetically. That's the problem. It works for Batman because he has darker colours and is usually…
Catwoman? Who is this Catwoman you speak of? I don't remember a character by that name in the movie. I believe Anne Hathaway played Selina something or other, not "Catwoman." Christopher Nolan would never stoop so low as to name one of HIS characters after a comic.
Yeah but in the case of Star Trek it made sense (although I don't like it). Abrams was dealing with 40+ years of screen continuity and was actively relaunching old, beloved characters (associated with very specific actors) with new actors. His solution was somewhat extreme but I understand where it came from - and…
True, but really when you think of it, most Trek villains do things for a reason that go beyond just being evil. It's a pretty common factor in the franchise stretching all the way back to the original pilot(s). So really they're not breaking new ground here.
I always love when they ask a producer/director/actor/writer/caterer about the movie they're working on and they say, "wow! it's going to be great!" and people think that's news. What else is Nolan going to say? "Actually, I think Zack Snyder is shit and he was WB's choice not mine. I really hate Superman - if it were…
Amen - he is an idiot, regardless of his Electro knowledge. Jamie Foxx in? I'm out.
That's in line with most of the Moffat era, though, which makes little sense.