She just wants to know if it was always a scam.

I’m shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that this cavalier attitude towards women’s bodily autonomy is evident in more than one place in his “morals.”

When is the last time a women’s sport was covered with the depth and interest that even shitty men’s teams get?

Lady reporters should have the same access to the team as their male counterparts.

I hate how people repeat the first fact though, like it’s an excuse to still operate. I’m not saying that’s what you’re doing, but I just really don’t like when people are like “ignore the abortions, they do so much good”. NEWSFLASH: Abortions are good.

Though I think federal dollars should go towards abortions or whatever reproductive care women need.

remember that case in Texas where doctors were ordered to keep a brain-dead woman alive because fetus - over the objections of her husband and family?

Literally no one is coming at me. I have not dismissed any trolls.

It isn’t a review of the movie itself. You can’t seem to grasp that. All right then.

Trippy. You’re reviewing a review that you haven’t read about a review of a movie that the reviewer hasn’t viewed. (back to LC)

Madeleine knows perfectly well how she feels about this movie’s existence and why she’s not seeing it, and that’s what she wrote about. You’re critiquing a critique that doesn’t exist.

This isn’t a review. Madeleine isn’t writing about the movie itself - she’s writing about why she won’t see it. A very different proposition! And quite successful as such, I thought.

I will not see this either, but I’d totally see a movie about your dad, talking about ice cream with Mohammed Ali and meeting the guy who walked across Niagara Falls and what I imagine are many more adventures.

My dad knows people. He had an ice cream date with Mohammed Ali. Besides I thought this movie was about my dad’s friend.

- “Spending the Weekend on the Couch in My Underwear Browsing the Internet Mindlessly: The Motion Picture.”

So this reminds me of the time that I went sky diving and the entire time the I was taking in this “incredible”, “life affirming” experience all that I could think was,

So they made fun of girls for being stereotypically girly and a man for not being stereotypically manly, is what you’re saying?

I was coming here to say this exactly. Men taking selfies after being encouraged to = a real super fan trying to participate in the game activities. Women taking selfies after being encouraged to = vapid, vain, self-involved idiots, probably just at the game to flirt and ogle players.

They were participating in a promotion that involved taking selfies put on by the stadium. It had just been announced right before this clip.

When did 20% get to be the standard? I’m not complaining but I recall 15% being the norm and then it’s 20%.