Agreed. I pretty much only say things online if I'd be comfortable with people in real life knowing what I'd said.
Agreed. I pretty much only say things online if I'd be comfortable with people in real life knowing what I'd said.
Look at yourself and your comments in this article. By no means are you helping at all - you're responding to comments without careful analysis, making generalizations, and in general, carrying around a severely-caustic attitude.
I agree with you about the publishers. You're correct.
Umm, a Radeon HD 4650 can run any of those games at settings higher than any console, at resolutions higher than any console. That's not "barely" running. And that's a low-end GPU.
Actually, it is. You're totally incorrect. None of that is nonsense whatsoever. Read the post.
That's understandable. I applaud thee for not attacking me viciously in the comments like many others, just for challenging their statements.
Did you even read the post? The TV is where you attach the PC. That PC is NOT even $500. It's $300.
I know, but you seem to completely ignore the fact that I already fully-acknowledged your comment, multiple times, in my OP.
No, you ignored everything I wrote. Why does no one read? PC gaming comes out to be cheaper, in the long-run. Read what I wrote, carefully, and drop the bias.
Did you even read what I wrote? Read again, and DROP THE CAUSTIC ATTITUDE. I already said that this is not what most people are capable of handling. Why don't I quote myself:
Your point about PC gaming being more expensive is a common myth. It's utterly false:
"Many of them actually don't want a next gen console altogether."
First part of your comment is not true. PC gaming is actually cheaper (no one needs to constantly update - GPUs from 2006 still run modern games absolutely fine, at settings/resolutions far beyond what consoles can handle):
In regards to the sofa comment - MANY PC gamers use wireless keyboards and mice in their laps or on conveniently-placed coffee tables. And quite a bit use controllers too.
First part of your comment is not true. PC gaming is actually cheaper:
No problem, I understand. And yeah, comments in this article can be...uneducated and infuriating.
This is not true at all. If you buy the right card, even a mid-range one, you can play any PC game for many, many years. You won't be able to maximize settings, of course, but consoles can't do that either - they play everything on low-medium, at resolutions BELOW 720p.
Halo Wars did not do well on the market and its servers were shut down. It's inevitable - for proper strategy gaming, you need a keyboard. It's really a pain without it. I'm a hardcore strategy gamer, and when I tried Halo Wars with some strategy-gaming friends, we all detested the controls immensely.
I don't dislike the console gamers (for the most part), but I am no fan of console gaming.
Well to be honest, about the 1080p thing - I game at 1920x1200. Don't have much of a reason to go higher up on the resolution scale, especially because I have an obsession with maxing out games - and to do that with resolutions like 2560x1600...you end up spending a strange amount of money. I'm running a GTX 680, so I…