Oh, O.K., thanks for the clarification.

O.K., thanks. I didn't rule out that they were wrong. Your last sentence seems a little assumptive and unnecessary.

Hmm, I was told that because of the sub-pixel situation (less sub-pixels per pixel), that the higher screen resolution of the Galaxy Nexus appears less sharp than that of the Galaxy S II. By several sources. It also doesn't help that the Nexus has a larger screen.

From what I understand, the Galaxy S II still has a better quality display because of a difference in the sub-pixel situation.

It should be noted that this is a Galaxy S II Skyrocket, not a regular S II. No idea if that makes a difference, but it is certainly a differentiating factor that could lead to different situations.

100% agreed. CoD is awful, and Rock, Paper, Shotgun hit the head on the nail in both articles.

You are being sarcastic, I trust? Hence the whole Applegate...

Hearted for awesome.

Yeah, I know, I was just talking about TFU.

Activision did NOT publish TFU outside of Japan. Just saying - their experience with it is very limited.

There's no elitism there - that's objective fact. Like it or not. The comment above me says what I want to say (the first paragraph).

That's not true at all, and everyone here has been trying to explain this to you. Let me give you an example of a massive difference - BF3. On the PC version, you have HUGE maps, 64-player servers, more vehicles, commo-rose, and mouse/keyboard gameplay. On console, these things are not there. This changes the game…

Yeah you're definitely a troll. Many comments here explaining otherwise, and you continue to stick to a belief already shown to be false.

It's not, and clearly you seem to be blind to this. Everyone is telling you otherwise. Games feel totally different on PC as well. Additional features too.

...really? Mods not being made by developers? That'd defeat the purpose. Mods are modifications. Not stuff that comes in the game from developers.

It hinders innovation in the industry. You just cannot push new graphics, audio, features, or physics with 5-6-year-old dated hardware. This, and the fact that console games look awful to me, is why I rage when games don't come to PC or are console ports.

Are you trolling? Because PC games (especially non-ports) are substantially different from console games in more than just graphics. Often there are additional features, ENORMOUS modding communities, better sound replication, and superior physics. Not to mention better controls and a different feel (FOV has something…

Yeah, well what about those who don't own consoles? Or do, but refuse to buy any console games because they don't enjoy console gaming (such as myself - I honestly get bored playing on consoles). Plus, BF1943 is super-arcadized compared to "real" Battlefield.

Umm? No bullshit there at all.

The most serious of Battlefield fans - PC Battlefield gamers.