Just for kicks, I compared the Walkman TCM-400 to the Note 2 (obviously the Note is thinner).

Humblebrag

Sad workers. Haunting series. Over-dramatic much?

When does someone create a subreddit for nudie snapchat photos...or does it already exist?

I'd be pissed too. I mean look at that. The picture shows blue paper with a gold ribbon and he got gold paper with a blue ribbon. Inexcusable!

So are you saying it's all about being oppressed? Being forced to turn off electronic devices when there's no legitimate safety risk is some form of oppression? Give me a fucking break. Yes, people can handle turning them off for 5 or 10 minutes. But if they weren't such whiny little bitches who just had to be on…

I'm not sure I see where I contradicted myself. Art is in the eye of the beholder, meaning there's always someone who could see something as art even if no one else does. I'm not saying it isn't art just because I don't find it appealing. In the past, people had somewhat of a well-defined idea of what's art and what…

Don't forget your duckface.

I tried it on an old toilet tank that was made of plastic. It had a crack in the bottom and dripped. I drained the tank, made sure it was completely dry, sealed it up and let it dry for a good 2 days (because every time I checked it, the sealer was still gooey). Finally I said screw it and filled it back up. It only…

By your definition, nearly everything is art because anything can trigger an emotional response. It just depends on the person. I guess one can argue that yes, anything can be considered art, but not everything falls under the conventional idea of art. A cell phone case with a skull on it: it's called art; old tape…

But what if that screen door is sealed with Flex Seal?

I don't agree with the whole "piece of art" description. Do you consider it art simply because it was made with a 3D printer? Would you call it that if it looked exactly the same, but was made conventionally rather than with a 3D printer? Probably not. Art is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose, but that word sure…

Sensationalistic titles are nothing new on Gizmodo...not that I approve. They do whatever they can for clicks.

Think of all the idiots who will post black & white instagram photos of the moon's surface.

Think of how much money they saved on material back then.

Oh look, more "art." That's it, I'm going outside to take photos of piles of dogshit. Look at how beautiful the swirl is, just like a soft-serve ice cream cone. And that pinched tip, gorgeous.

Dark, you say?

Cracker, please.

NASA were the ones to make this news by releasing the photos and the explanation behind them. Giz is simply taking their news and forwarding it to its readers.

Don't tell me, endorsed by Justin Bieber, right?