OohBurner
OohBurner
OohBurner

Float... to the... bottom...

Accompany her to a field so they can smell flowers.

PS. Ungreying all the positive, supportive comments here is my favourite thing I’ve done today and the best use of this power.

today wouldn’t be today without women

Not only could I not take off today, my work’s entire internal memo about today was about He for She and man who teaches women to read in Kenya. I work at a company that got a perfect score from HRC and was named a fortune 100 best company to work for and in diversity inc’s top 50.

And she’s what most would consider a prostitute, soo. . . .

He can’t say both:

Sending you support and admiration for talking about it!

Ok, so what you’re saying is the seal holds everything in, and is strong enough to do so until the pressure from peeing releases the seal, and everything gushes out like old faithful only a lot more explosive and bloody?

Ugh. I know. The unfathomable grace of this woman just guts me.

I highly recommend listening to the Sword and Scale episode on the death penalty for people on either side of the issue (they don’t take a side over the other, but it actually convinced me against the death penalty purely for financial reasons). http://swordandscale.com/sword-and-scale-episode-72/

The amount of money its will cost us just to keep him locked could be better spent else where.

Sorry to double comment but I think it’s also worth mentioning that cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population.

Additionally, if we put him to death, then he gets what he wants and the alt-right gets the martyr they want. Both good reasons to let him live a long long long healthy life in jail.

But if your moral code allows for exceptions, what use is it? What good is a justice system that isn’t applied equally in all cases?

Do we as a society sentence rapists to be raped? Do we take someone’s leg, if their negligence causes an accident that means someone has to have their leg amputated? No, because we are a civilized society with a code of ethics that would consider “eye for an eye” barbaric. So, why is the death penalty acceptable? How

He’s a murderer, a terrorist, an unapologetic racist, and an evil piece of shit.

Aaand now he’s a martyr for his heinous “cause”.