I mean, I wrote roughly 1,100 words explaining why I thought it was a good point. You can read those words here if you’re interested.

So? “If you do one thing, you’ll potentially offend players on your team and the manager that just won the world series but if you do the other thing you’ll upset a bunch of MAGA shitbrains” isn’t some sort of unresolvable moral quandary.

Right. Also, the stark division down ethic lines of who’s going and who isn’t can’t be good for team unity. Your teammates are essentially saying, “Yes I know he hates people who look like you BUT [my autograph / my photo-op / I don’t really care about you].” That’s how you build a great clubhouse environment!

Yeah, like, those lists should surprise absolutely no one. Florida Man Chris Sale definitely owns a few MAGA hats. 

yeah and KD got 3 free throws late for kicking his leg out. What’s your point?

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO “OTHER SIDE” TO THIS STORY FUCK FACE.

I know my first thought whenever I see Fox News shoot themselves in the dick by horrendously botching a story to spread disinformation is that it’s ok because BOTH SIDES, AMIRITE?!?!?

It’s really adorable that you think the kids will learn anything from this. 

Because it’s not a question of “justice”. Football is an entertainment product, and as consumers we have the prerogative to dictate who the NFL employs to provide us with that product. It’s the same as refusing to buy a ticket to see a Chris Brown concert or see a Roman Polanski movie.

Each team should get a set number of Crime Points that can be assigned to individual players as crimes are committed, and once a player reaches, say, 51 Crime Points then a graduating set of punishments would be assigned by the league based on the player’s total Crime Points over a 3-year period. After 3 years, the…

Don't feed the troll, guys. 

Ha ha. The rich get to stay rich, in part, because people like you fervently (and a little pathetically) defend them for free, and you all perpetuate their propaganda to stave off the logical and inevitable consequences of their actions.

ugh

And his team just traded for and paid Frank Clark. 

No, you couldn’t be more wrong. When people make bad choices and break the law, they deserve to be apprehended, charged and tried in court. They do not deserve whatever extra, unnecessary violence police officers want to subject them to. Police officers have no right to exact punishment. They are there to apprehend…

Many unions are. Some unions are not.

Do you actually find this a difficult concept to grasp, or are you merely being a disingenuous bellend?

“Officer Figueroa was fired but is trying to get his job back. And he has a lot better chance of that after his acquittal.”   This, it’s bad enough that bad cops are out there.  The poop icing on the cake is that they can’t be fired because their unions fight too hard for bad eggs.

Wow, you are a true, dyed-in-the-wool asshole. Let’s rephrase your avalanche of bullshit: your solution is to deny homeless people services so that enough of them grow ill or die of exposure, encouraging them to avoid your city? That’s the king of all NIMBY shitty non-solutions. The rest of us are trying to address…

Gosh, if only the people living outdoors had a facility that was dedicated to getting them INDOORS, and that had a proven track record of helping nearly half of their guests successfully exit homelessness. Something exactly like the facility you’re opposing here.

And the reason the city is covered in human shit and used needles is because of those limousine liberals fighting against shelters and affordable housing.