Ask the old guy about how great shoe technology was 50 years ago compared to now? I’m very certain he’d’ve preferred walking around in the comfort of Nike technology rather than the terribleness that is using original Chuck Taylor’s as a walking shoe.

Not The Boxer.

Adults!

Steph Curry in Mugsy’s role
Draymond Green in Larry Johnson’s
James Harden in Charles Barkley’s
Pau Gasol in Patrick Ewing’s (Love would also be good, but he’s on the same team as LeBron)
Roy Hibbert in Shawn Bradley’s

Unless Thor comes face-to-face with, uh, hmm, is there a slovenly, cheese-packing Avenger?

That’d be Minnesota, which is thankfully not Wisconsin.

This is great, and highlights a point people often ignore, that the NBA is fucking difficult to sustain success in, and even more difficult to make the finals in.

This was a good debate. I think the roster is starting to turn around, and I’m hopeful they can fill holes next year through a more guard-heavy 2016 draft and free agency period, but I understand the majority of non-Sixers fans being very skeptical. I’m just glad we can both agree to disagree while making cogent…

If only winning is entertainment, why root for anybody but the Cavs, Spurs, Clippers and Warriors? Those are the only teams with a shot to win.

You’re exaggeration is why people feel the need to defend Hinkie. The comparisons you’re making are not valid (Hinkie didn’t have the Hawks roster to work with, nor the same NBA landscape Morley did), and the only arguably stupid moves he’s made is trading KJ, who didn’t want to be there, and drafting Embiid, which is…

I’m totally okay with those criticisms. I don’t feel the same way, but I can see people feeling that way. (Also, in my earnestness, I forgot to mentioned that that trade exception joke was very good.)

I guess two years is “years,” but tell me what he could’ve done better other than not take the risk on Embiid? Kept Jrue Holiday and Spencer Hawes as the faces of the franchise?

I don’t think any rational Sixers fan (which I’m aware could be an oxymoron) would argue people are dumb for doubting it. We’d argue they’re dumb for saying Hinkie is dumb and evil before his plan has had a chance to play out, and also for projecting this dumb evil wannabe genius image on Hinkie, who seems like a…

Ahhh, I confused Leah and Maci, which is probably why I was surprised to see that Leah (thinking it was Maci) had fallen into a bad drug habit because she also seemed pretty level-headed and oh my god this needs to stop.

Ray Lankford or Brian Jordan was the first person I saw hit a home run in person. Ozzie Smith also did a backflip before the first inning of that game. I was 5 and still had the wherewithal not to become a Cards fan.

Catelynn is the one I couldn’t think of, probably because she and her boyfriend (husband?) are the only one seemingly well-adjusted young people to ever appear on the show.

Because they’re the second group of Teen Moms. Teen Mom 1 had Farrah and that large couple that physically assaulted each other all the time and Maci with the twins and someone else and goddamnit why do I know this?

That's a corner kick assist.

Legit question: Does he lead any men?

MCW was okay but can’t shoot for shit, so if it’s someone you don’t feel is worth keeping around and you can a high first rounder for him? Go for it. Tells you a lot that Noel is happier about Ish fucking Smith running point than he was about MCW’s play.