I wish I hadn't even bothered replying now. After looking through the rest of the thread I realised you're that special kind of idiot who isn't worth even attempting to reason with. But what the hey, I'll try anyway and then you'll predictably respond that you didn't read it. Even though you did and you're just too…

It's not theft, it's not stealing. It's piracy (copyright infringement). Now because the response to this statement is so predictable I expect it'll be about five minutes before you (or someone else) starts accusing me of justifying it. Despite the fact that such a statement constitutes nothing of the sort. It's…

the idea is that people who have a certain type of experience (i.e., black culture) that other people (i.e., white people) do not tend to have a more valid opinion than those who do not have that experience.

I agree that sometimes people don't have adequate perspective. But that alone does not make their criticisms invalid. Asserting that someone's argument is invalid because of their personal skills or experience is a form of ad hominem. It's never a valid argument in any circumstance. If their criticisms are invalid…

That's a big leap to make, more than half the people calling shenanigans probably didn't even enter the contest. And the majority of those that did probably didn't even have a chance of winning and they knew it. Besides its not a case where it looks a little suspicious but might still be legit, it full on reeks of…

I don't agree that game licenses should be lost if you cheat at multiplayer. Banned from the multiplayer sure, but the licenses are something that they paid for. Cheater or not.

Take turns placing them, they can only be placed with like for like sides touching (a five adjacent to a five), the goal is to place all your pieces.

It's a ridiculous argument used by insecure people who can't take criticism or people who can't handle criticism of the works of others. Not all criticism is valid of course, but attempting to invalidate it by questioning the persons own skills is a fallacious argument. It's attacking the person, not the argument.

I agree, the biggest problem with the rotoscoping is not the style (although I don't like it) but that it's a pointless trade off. You lose all the charm of animation and in return you gain all the limitations of live action. And on top of that the resulting aesthetic, while not bad in of itself, is incredibly…

I am so convinced by your logical argument and sound scientific (and totally not anecdotal) evidence. Clearly the Xbox controller must be superior. Clearly I am not being terribly sarcastic.

I'd have lasers in my security system anyway. They wouldn't do anything of course, and would have wide enough gaps that they could be easily traversed. They'd just inspire a false sense of security as the thief tripped the motion sensors. Plus lasers look cool.

I haven't played in like a week. My town will be a wasteland when I return.

Is it illegal? Because against the ToS or the EULA isn't necessarily the same as illegal. Most terms in them are actually unenforceable and have no real legal basis. A ToS is almost purely a safety net for the publisher that prevents you going after them in court if they ban you from their service. But it doesn't…

On Xbox One? Then yeah its pretty much inevitable that it'll be shut down at some point. If it's popular enough though it's going to last a long time. On the PC however? Games retain multiplayer support (even if it's no longer supported by the developer) as long as a community for it exists.

It's not about the actual amount, it's that he uses more than is necessary. He over eggs his setup and it weakens his punchline. I love SMBC, and it's because Zach knows how to tell a joke. He can just as easily do it in one panel as he can ten. He doesn't try to constrain or pad out his comics just to fit a format.…

Eh, with a lot of games designed primarily for controllers I'd disagree to an extent. Admittedly some of the ones he's listed aren't good examples, but even as a long term PC gamer there's games I feel more comfortable playing with a controller than KBM.

The MotionInJoy DS3 tool pretty much makes that fact redundant though. It's capable of emulating a DS3 as a 360 pad. It's a much easier solution than mapping it to keyboard inputs, and works with pretty much everything that supports 360 controllers.

Are you using the 360 Controller emulator option? I've yet to find a game that has a problem with it. Your issue might be with the game itself and not the controller, check there isn't a setting somewhere that's missed and of course that the game actually has controller support.

I never argued that they should, I'm just pointing out that they didn't. But as for why they should have, to save face if nothing else. Whether it happened before it was on sale or not doesn't change the fact that they pissed off a lot of their fans just by planning what they were going to do. An apology would help…

I don't know, because some people still haven't forgiven them for trying it in the first place? Just because they've given up on it doesn't mean that it never happened. Besides they never really apologised or admitted they were wrong.