I disagree. If you're sitting on a domain for an excessive length of time without putting it to use then REGARDLESS of whether anyone else has designs on said domain you're squatting it. You're holding on to it for the sake of holding it, rather than for any legitimate purpose. I have no problem with people holding on…

If you're not making any use of a domain nearly a decade after you registered it, then it's squatting. Regardless of whether anyone else wants that domain or not. At that point it's clear they have no legitimate intent to put it to use and are just holding it for the sake of holding it. That's squatting, whether the…

I am serious, and your case is different. Even if you're not using it for anything significant you're still making use of it. The domain in this case simply has one of those placeholder pages that's used on a completely unused domain. From the statement the intended use of the website hasn't materialised, nearly a…

Considering you pay for continued ownership of it, it's more like renting than it is buying. You don't really own a domain. The fact you pay for it doesn't really give you any more rights than you have over a rented property. You can't be evicted without good cause, but you can still be evicted.

How the hell does it make me a fanboy just because I disapprove of cybersquatting? That's the dumbest thing I've heard all day. Also I disagree that you should be able to hold on to a domain as long as you choose to. Domains don't work like copyrights, but they shouldn't work like property either. People shouldn't be…

I would have thought that sitting on a domain for nine years without doing anything with it would be sufficient cause to argue that the owners have no rights or legitimate interests in it. Seriously there should be a statute of limitations on this kind of thing. Use it or lose it.

I can see why they wanted her to remove the piercings. Yeesh they look hideous. I mean I'm not really a fan of piercings outside the ear but the cheek ones are just really ugly.

That's an overly simplistic way of looking at things though. First of all we don't know how much more money they need. If they only need another few hundred thousand then it's not fair to say that the $3.45mil paid for only half the game. Secondly development costs aren't evenly distributed on a month by month basis.…

Congratulations, you win the dumb comment of the day award. This prestigious honour comes with a special trophy. It's invisible!

I'm not defending them, I'm just using some perspective. You should try it some time.

Because the game they are making now is significantly different from the one they would have made with the 400k. They made the game a whole lot bigger after they got the three million because they could hardly take three million and make a 400k game with it. Unfortunately they underestimated how much bigger they were…

This pretty much highlights a big problem with Kickstarter, stretch goals get out of hand and budgets balloon leading project creators to get too ambitious. It's pretty easy to budget for what you actually need. But after you hit that point I imagine it becomes difficult to know what to do with all the money. It's a…

They cover a fair amount of FG related news. Not as much as a website specialising in that area would, but the percentage coverage is generally in line with all the other stuff they cover. The problem is the FGC only shows up when they post about something bad happening in the FGC and then just don't read the site the…

(Skip to 1m30s, embedding doesn't like start times)

Problem with the Blade is the same still though. Poor value to performance ratio, although it seems improved from the original Blade. I've no doubt it's a pretty awesome machine though. People complain a lot about Alienware machines, but it is largely because they don't offer good value. Having owned one for a while I…

It's supposed to sound stupid. Xbox One is a stupid name and deserves an equally stupid nickname.

By that extension all public changing rooms, showers, toilets, and dormitories should be mixed. Because violation of human rights and all.

Yeah, except you'd get the same response from Koreans if they had it the other way. Either way they did it would upset one side as they'd perceive it to be in support of the other. If they made it accept both then they'd be accused of being spineless for not getting involved.

I don't know why I find this so hilarious, the lame origin story just makes it even funnier.

Is this exclusive to pre orders? I'd agree then. Free DLC with a pre order is fine, limiting the DLC to pre orders only is as you say gross.