wait, didn't you guys to the same?

Such fucking bullshit. How can you contribute to a feminist blog if you're going to link to the pictures that were hacked? Having a conscience later on and removing the link hardly does any justice. Why show faux outrage at 4Chan when you're doing the exact same thing?

What really pisses me off is the blasé attitude of those sending them around now. "they're already out there, it's not my responsibility."

seems weird that, despite your justified (supposed) indignation about this, you're posting about it at all

ETA: The link was removed, so kudos for that, but I still question the original motivation for including it.

clicks don't bait themselves.

Why provide the link? Serves no purpose.

Just from the comments section here, I can see that there are definitely plenty of people who actually can provide a rational, and more importantly, civil counterargument. I think the problem (and now that I think about it, quite ingenious on her part) is that she does things like disable comments on her video which…

I have a few issues with this article and your coverage of it.

1) Since when is 3 considered many?

You hit the nail on the head, a lot of people claim they want to find a middle ground when all they really want is for you to eventually agree with them.

To me, this well is beyond poisoned. Debating her ideas is impossible because of extremes from both side foaming at the mouth at anyone who doesn't agree with them. This is why me, and those smarter than me, have withdrawn from anything relating to her and her views. You get torn to pieces for not agreeing with the…

See, this bugs me quite a bit. Back when she released her first video, I felt there were some problems with it, so, as best I could, I explained why I felt that way. People chose to take it as "concern trolling," and much, much worse. Her defenders, at the time, remind me of the same people who attack and deride her.

So you're saying that the issue with men showering with women is that men assault and degrade women? So as long as the man in question doesn't assault or degrade them then women probably won't have a problem with that?

The Jackie Robinson comparison is over-the-top. Sam will never go thru what Robinson did (thanks entirely to Jackie Robinson going thru it first).

Just as all gay men aren't "lustful cockmonsters", straight men don't turn into boob touching zombies when they see a woman. By definition, gay men are attracted to other men physically just as straight men are attracted to women physically. So by the logic presented in this article, men and women should be able to…

It is very important that Sam respect the sacredness of men showering together because he doesn't want to make it all gay-like.

Can someone explain to me why sports stadiums can afford giant screens, fancy vendors/clubs, amazing private suites, constantly replacing/improving the turf and all the other expensive necessities, but they can't include like 30 private showers for their players?

I'm sorry but its not important and shouldn't be discussed. Your comparison to Robinson at the beginning is laughable. The question they're asking is are the other players concerned that Sam is checking out their dick. Thats it. I would say the answer is no. And I would say the other players don't think so either

If only he'd hit a woman instead of a pipe, he'd be playing in a couple weeks.

Was she not already in the hospital? Where do people have surgery these days?