OBABS
Obvious Burner account, but still
OBABS

Two thumbs up on the story, but part of me really admires this looney guy.

I love that not only did she not understand the diet she claimed to be on, but that she expected you to monitor her diet FOR her, and tell her what she could and couldn't eat.

I guess it depends on the context—this says it was in a pre-taped interview package, so I think whether she was responding to an off-camera question, or something, is relevant there.

And then there was Nancy Grace's nipple....

I did think about that, and it's a fair point. But I'm thinking more narrowly of the idea that she's expressing, which seems basically to be "this is how I want to dress. This is what feels right for me." And I feel like that should be enough, in that case.

OK, but...if we roll our eyes at Candace Cameron in this instance, aren't we basically saying that her reason for claiming autonomy over her own body is less valid than other people's reasons? Is there really a WRONG reason to exercise your right to dress as makes you most comfortable?

And what's the deal with her needing to whisk the baby away to clean her up and then clean up Kanye? She was wearing a zillion-dollar white dress. Is he unable to wipe up his own chest?

As most others have said, I'd tread reaaaaaaally carefully with that one. I *regularly* get "oh wow, you've lost weight!" from people I haven't seen in a while, and let me just tell you: I have not lost weight. I've been at the same weight for the past 12 years. There's no change. So when people say that, all I hear

I know, I so confused by her statement...does she imagine that our bodies synthesize Vitamin D from sunlight in a *site-specific* way? What an incredibly inefficient process that would be.

I can pretty well follow along with her until right here: "It's not like this is somebody that's been prosecuted and found guilty of something, and you can then go, 'I don't support this lifestyle or whatever.'"

As much as it minimizes and patronizes and objectifies elderly people to dismiss them as simply "cute," it patronizes them to suggest that they probably don't know or understand what Instagram is. The linked article shows every indication that this woman is sharp and lucid and clear on what's going on. Instagram is

I guess there's only so much you can do with an immovable force like that.

Ugh, I can imagine. What does your husband/partner say?

I'd hazard a guess that "Jesus never said that" would be true in 9/10 of cases where she's attributing some cockamamie idea to Christ. Though she'd probably contradict that claim.

Oh, but they will. It doesn't matter how much you explain you don't want to hear it, at some point in the evening a guest is going to request "Love Shack," and by God, the band just goes ahead and plays "Love Shack," just like they have every right in the world.

The only anatomically-correct word (for either sex) that I can think of that sounds sexy enough to use while sexting is "nipple."

Give me like 5-6 days to gather together all my organ-reshaping accoutrements and photograph them in the right light. Then I'll Dropbox them over to you.

An egg is fine if you're too afraid to be uncomfortable, but it's better if your gap can be more wedge-shaped. Target knows that men like a right angle. That's why I use a doorstop.

The more obnoxious part, I think, is the way she was treated after—everyone is so jammed up with a sense of their own importance/the importance of what they're doing/fear of getting into trouble in some unidentified way, that start doing weird things like claiming store managers' names are confidential. When part of

Her job is to make and sell pop music, and part of selling pop music is making videos. Until she met this guy, she had a particular "brand" and particular things she did in the interest of selling those videos. Was she compromising herself, and letting others commodify her body? I don't know. Maybe. But that's a