yeah, a decentralized frictionless digital money that is fully transparent, immune from any sort of QE bullshit is just like tupperware... yup.

I'm a lady and an early adopter of BTC. so... yeah.

it's funny because as a money it's actually more real than the dollar. opps.

wtf are you even talking about, how did you buy these bitcoins that you need bank info to get the bitcoins out of your wallet.

no it wasnt used exclusively on the silk road. you're just wrong.

also there are 2 big replacements for the silk road already up and running and... the silk road is already back soo...

Yes. Yes they do.

if I lived in florida I would totally pay for laser with Bitcoins...

so because SOME rotts are aggressive it is okay to shoot them?

GOOD NEWS EVERYONE!! according to roblognick it's okay to kill cops because they are renowned for being aggressive assholes!

you misunderstood my point I think.

if person A pulls over person B. Person B reaches in their own pocket and in response person A shoots them. This is murder, this is also 'acceptable' for cops. if you make any sort of sudden move they can shoot you and claim you were reaching for a weapon. of course this is not…

The FDA kills.

$600,000,000,000 was the lowest bidder? Really? fucking really?

its less of they believe me, and more of, they changed my mind based on their writings. I mean rothbard died when I was a kid.

Secondly, I'm advocating capitalism, REAL capitalism none of this bullshit crony stuff or corporatist nonsense.

as for laws, I'm not advocating for lawlessness. I'm advocating for polycentric…

You're the one who was implying that nobody believed any of this shit essentially asking for 'name drops'

It actually has plenty of 'practical foundations' the mere fact that we have computers and cars and can get cheap food nearly instantly etc etc etc is a testament to my "belief system."

Also may I ask where you are a law professor at? and if you have a Ph.D from harvard law or university of Chicago or Columbia? Because…

there is three major problems with this love it or leave it argument.

Actually lots of people agree, it's mostly based on the writings of David Friedman, a law scholar and economist, and Murry Rothbard, an economist, political theorist, and historian.

If someone, and their friends, kick in my door and are attempting to steal my stuff. I have the right to defend myself.

If the police, and other police kick in my door, and are attempting to steal my stuff, I have the right to defend myself.

Think of it this way. A man walks down a street and gets in a conversation…

Actually I don't support other laws based on the initiation of force. Nice try though. I ONLY support laws AGAINST the initiation of force, when means enforcing them would be defensive force.

so like a law against murder, rape, theft, assault etc. Nice Strawman though! Maybe next time kiddo!

if you resist, if you try to defend yourself that will give them the excuse they need to kill you.

don't have have the right to kill them if I feel endangered? I mean they're the ones trespassing on my property, they're the ones kicking down my door, they're the ones who after failed having extorted me for money are…

a tv calibration service is not something you can really copy. so that doesn't apply either.

saying that i cant be serious and then appealing to the judges who simply judge based on the law i am arguing against is the same as just stating the law. Thats not an argument.

I love the gem of "you dont own what other people…