yeah brietbart can be pretty terrible, but believe it or not people here can be rather terrible too (maybe not THAT terrible). I spend quite a lot of time disrupting what I perceive to be echo chambers, brietbart just isn't worth the effort.

the thing about good efficient markets is that it for them to work it…

yup, if you can't for anyone to do anything society becomes anarchist.
As an ideological anarchist, whos ideology is based on the rejection of the initiation of force, like forcing people to fund things.

I think this is dandy.

also doctors in hospitals have given free emergency care before, I don't see why when they…

okay then I totally agree.

Why would I move to sudan...

You're so fucking stupid you don't even know that you mean Somalia!

I do offer something.

Anarcho-Capitalism.

And yes, this all matters, the states interference in our live is disruptive and harmful, every state action is coercion, every law a gun lifted. We shouldn't tolerate this.

I can't believe you are justifying the monopolization of justice and law, which was used to justify…

private property in no way justifies slavery or rape. Both are pretty major violations of private property (the property of one's self and one's body)

as for constitutional law? I give zero fucks. I could not give less fucks. The amount of fucks I give about the constitution is exactly zero. it's garbage, it's shit,…

of course people can hurt each other if they agree to it, things like S&M, boxing, kickboxing etc exist do they not?

but there is a difference between someone signing a contract and someone being tricked.

one is fruad one is not.

if they signed the contract I suppose =/

I think this falls under fraud (on the companies part) but I'm not sure.

edit: I would like to clarify.

if you wrote such a contract up, and tricked people into signing it, it would also be fruad (and since the thing in question is sex and not money services or goods) it would be…

1.) no, it's not. I have not heard libertarians talk about rand except one, moluneux, and he mentions her maybe 1 in every 100 videos. on this site I hear it as a strawman from people like you all the time.
2.) you're dodging the question and i didnt say they were. I asked when is aggressive force, or coercion okay?
3.)…

I'm neither.

"human interaction should be voluntary."
OMG TROLL! we NEED coercion, because things like theft, assault, rape and murder are the keystone of society ;_;

except that

a.) not all libertarians are randiods, as a libertarian rand was kind of quirky. Why is it I hear liberals talk about rand more than libertarians do.
b.) in what circumstances is aggressive force, or coercion okay?
c.) libertarians do not want everyone to be 'self sufficient' they do not think everyone is an…

when you say it should be out of print do you mean... nobody should buy it and publish it?

or that the government should force it out of print?

also you're right about everything else.

Lols, I love liberals and conservatives.

"do you hate that you're forced to fund X? well everyone should be forced to fund Y!"
mean while elsewhere on the internet.
"omfg we are forced to fund Z? we should be forcing everyone to fund W!!!"

I have a novel idea, lets not force people to fund anything. because coercion and…

no thanks, violence is only okay in self defense or the defense of others.

better plan? you're such a fucking idiot.

I know a few people who have lost their insurance and if they want the same quality plan they're going to have to pay as much as twice as much.

how can someone really be this blind and obedient to obama? It seems like this whole thing was rigged to fail from the get-go.

I bet in…

that is a good point, I wasn't there.

do you think selling alcohol during prohibition was not a victimless crime? Do you think there is no competition in the black market? (obviously there would be better competition in a free above the board market, with the ability to have a brand name and a reputation, consistency, access to legal dispute resolution,…

Millions of people lose their insurance under a law that is supposed to give everyone insurance and you don't see the problem here?

all of these people have to now pay more for the same or lesser service and your answer is "LOL GET OVER IT!"

yeaaaah... I think that perhaps YOU are the asshole. I'm just against coercion…

Actually the government is not subject to the rule of law, dispite what it claims. It calls its own violence law and the violence of private people crime.

The thing is, that issues like this could be easily settled under old common law, or by private property based society. To bad the government ruined those things.

FOR…