1.) no, it's not. I have not heard libertarians talk about rand except one, moluneux, and he mentions her maybe 1 in every 100 videos. on this site I hear it as a strawman from people like you all the time.
2.) you're dodging the question and i didnt say they were. I asked when is aggressive force, or coercion okay?
3.)…

I'm neither.

"human interaction should be voluntary."
OMG TROLL! we NEED coercion, because things like theft, assault, rape and murder are the keystone of society ;_;

except that

a.) not all libertarians are randiods, as a libertarian rand was kind of quirky. Why is it I hear liberals talk about rand more than libertarians do.
b.) in what circumstances is aggressive force, or coercion okay?
c.) libertarians do not want everyone to be 'self sufficient' they do not think everyone is an…

when you say it should be out of print do you mean... nobody should buy it and publish it?

or that the government should force it out of print?

also you're right about everything else.

Lols, I love liberals and conservatives.

"do you hate that you're forced to fund X? well everyone should be forced to fund Y!"
mean while elsewhere on the internet.
"omfg we are forced to fund Z? we should be forcing everyone to fund W!!!"

I have a novel idea, lets not force people to fund anything. because coercion and…

no thanks, violence is only okay in self defense or the defense of others.

better plan? you're such a fucking idiot.

I know a few people who have lost their insurance and if they want the same quality plan they're going to have to pay as much as twice as much.

how can someone really be this blind and obedient to obama? It seems like this whole thing was rigged to fail from the get-go.

I bet in…

that is a good point, I wasn't there.

do you think selling alcohol during prohibition was not a victimless crime? Do you think there is no competition in the black market? (obviously there would be better competition in a free above the board market, with the ability to have a brand name and a reputation, consistency, access to legal dispute resolution,…

Millions of people lose their insurance under a law that is supposed to give everyone insurance and you don't see the problem here?

all of these people have to now pay more for the same or lesser service and your answer is "LOL GET OVER IT!"

yeaaaah... I think that perhaps YOU are the asshole. I'm just against coercion…

Actually the government is not subject to the rule of law, dispite what it claims. It calls its own violence law and the violence of private people crime.

The thing is, that issues like this could be easily settled under old common law, or by private property based society. To bad the government ruined those things.

FOR…

I did, I also watched the video where she admitted she never wrote anything and was bad at comedy, certainly that had something to do with why she quit...

so why should supporters not have to read what is in it? are they not also paid to be informed?

sounds like you got a case of "NO! this lying cancerous tumor is good, that lying blood sucking leech is bad!"

i hate to break it to you... all politicians are bad, they're all liars, they're all leeches.

are you saying every single person who voted yes on the bill, and voted no on repeals have read the entire thing?

republics are even worse, because instead of 51% of the population being my master, with fear that next year they will be on the other end of the ballot, some dicknose in washington is my master.

and yes humans are interconnected and inter dependent. but that doesn't mean I don't own myself and you don't own your self.
…

gosh, i'm sure all the people who voted yes and support it read the 11,000+ pages.

I dont see how millions losing their healthcare and being threatened to buy insurance at higher prices in order to subsidize older folks is not also bad...

I guess all non white straight male comedians should just quit because hecklers can be racist/sexist/homophobic?

also comedians never joke about those things ever oh no! there is literally zero possibility to turn an asshole racist/sexist/homophobic heckler into a joke and keep the audience on your side. NOPE! that is…

not really, my ideas are principle based, logically deduced from those principles, entirely consistent, not arbitrary and entangled with sound economic thought.

I'm sorry but "i would argue X" is not an argument just a statement of your position.

Why do you think selling heroin is not a victimless crime?