NobodyGT
Nobody
NobodyGT

yes and pretty much every ceo of every company uses money to donate to lobby efforts or to politicians in an attempt to force their legislation on the rest of us.

regulations, mandates, tariffs, whatever it doesnt matter, the fact that you're concerned about the ineffectual lobbies when there are lobbys that are

you clearly have no idea what you're talking about if you think anarchism doesnt have principles.

secondly you also clearly have no idea what anarchism is.

doesnt matter at all, because those hate groups really can't do anything they're just wasting their money.

and these hate groups just go to show how politics are violence, its a small group of people who hate LGBT folks and want to use govt force to push their ideals about 'morality' or whatever the fuck on everyone.

it'

yes, and the govt charters corporations which protects the people who defraud people.
if they werent hiding behind a corporation, which are govt created entities, they could be brought to justice.

corporations are charted by the govt and when you have a monopoly on the courts along side that the illegitimate liability

people voluntarily gave them that money to invest on their behalf.

and how people spend THEIR money is not YOUR business. You really have no business calling yourself a libertarian if thats how you think about other people using their money how they want.

also giving businesses capital to invest is not helpful to

Lol people voluntarily trading shares of companies and money between themselves aren't robbing you, taxes are.

violence is practical and effective in the long term?

thats an interesting belief, can you explain to me how having a group of people who loot and plunder the entire nation and then throw pennies on the dollar back at the people who were looted and robbed is 'practical and effective'

where there is voluntary

hate groups that will never get anything accomplished.

and as far as I'm concerned, Every CEO uses money to support lobby groups of politicians, and ALL politics are immoral.

what am I going to do, boycott everything?

if you're a moderate libertarian you're not ideologically pure.

you make exceptions for the Non-aggression principle. Whats the point of having sound principles if you don't apply them universally.

I would assert you're an extremest since you justify state violence.

My assumption based on what i've seen you post now and before and the fact you're on jezebel complaining that 'conservatives' are more organized.

Lol, this made me laugh hard coming from a liberal.

you can't be 'ideologically pure' when your 'ideology' has no real principles.
you can't be 'ideologically pure' when your 'ideology' is self contradictory.
you can't be 'ideologically pure' when your 'ideology' demands that you some how never do business with people

If I ate meat I would eat chik fil a (i hear its good)
and I will continue to eat barilla

why? Because I give NO FUCKS what the ceo thinks because it has nothing to do with their product.

I don't know whats worse, being in the closet in highschool or being out of it.