Nihilexistentialist
Nihilexistentialist
Nihilexistentialist

I own this (IIRC there was a similar sale for Memorial Day) and it’s great. Not life changing but going from a lower end version of this type of vape from a different manufacturer shows a big difference in how fast it heats up and it’s overall better built and does better with continuous use. So at $100 I’d recommend

I own this (IIRC there was a similar sale for Memorial Day) and it’s great. Not life changing but going from a lower

Major shock coming up: A new game might have new characters.

Blu-rays have a coating on them that prevents issues. Anything significant enough to damage would make the game unsellable

You sure showed them.

now it’s becoming a way to protest an idiot owner

What if Amazon is part of your local economy?

Check today’s post. It looks like you might have gotten your wish.

Check today’s post. It looks like you might have gotten your wish.

Ah, I figured that was a digital only port like the others but I’m remembering when this came out incorrectly and it was originally on Xbox One. The page only has digital - I wouldn’t expect them to do research further.

Ah, I figured that was a digital only port like the others but I’m remembering when this came out incorrectly and it

What games are you referring to? As far as I can tell the only stuff that would be ambiguous (the non-Steam ones) that are digital are only available digitally for the platform they’re on sale for.

What games are you referring to? As far as I can tell the only stuff that would be ambiguous (the non-Steam ones)

Does it actually connect into that data from Google Fit or is this actually an API call for the accelerometer and similar? If it’s the latter than I can imagine that Shazam uses this to determine how the user is attempting to pickup the music (ie holding it facing them, holding it up, etc.)

When I made that comment 4 years ago these services were more expensive.

I expressed similar sentiment in my comment. What were people expecting? The whole reason you’re explicitly asked for permissions is so that you can avoid shady shit. If the app doesn’t really need your camera or doesn’t need access to your photos then don’t let it in the first place. I would guess the reply back from

I really hope you’re not the one that brought this effortless troll post out of the greys.

You can restrict which apps have access to your camera, even if you’ve given them permission to use it in the past.

Wow, a full year after Lyft debuted this? Usually Uber is ahead which is why the headline is surprising to me as I assumed they had it already.

What do you mean lately? It’s been like that forever. Clearly you have something else going on that is causing you to react so harshly to this. Just ignore it and move on.

What do you mean lately? It’s been like that forever. Clearly you have something else going on that is causing you

To the Samsung forums.

Double posting instead of editing? You must have been really mad about this despite it having absolutely zero impact on you. They don’t vet every product to a large degree and that should be obvious so I don’t understand your attitude.

Double posting instead of editing? You must have been really mad about this despite it having absolutely zero impact

I’m pretty unimpressed by phones as a whole this year so I’m definitely waiting it out. Here’s hoping that future Sony will get past whatever legal issue prevents them from enabling the the fingerprint scanner in the US and their cameras are at least as good as this year’s flagships or that Apple releases an iPhone

There’s no easy way to work it into the design. There were tons of rumors of making the entire touchscreen recognize touch and that didn’t pan out just yet. The tech exists (for Qualcomm at least) so I can see this coming in the future. I think people are being overly skeptical about the facial scanning though - it’s