No, that's definitely somebody else. ;)

It seems unlikely. First, it's not necessary (although the Indian sari is that big). Second, it's a lot of wool, at a time when weaving would have taken time.

I just use a pair of standard hiking boots. They're much more utilitarian. The dress shoes (gillie brogues) are another one of these daft garments worn to show that you don't have to work, in a similar way to the male fad for high heels during the 17th century.

I genuinely do have hair the same colour as my friend's golden retriever - although mine is considerably longer than the dog's.

PS: My opinions of that godsawful Gibson film are not suited to civilised company. "Totally wrong" would be unreasonably polite.

Okay. A Scot (known to wear his kilt around Edinburgh simply because it's comfortable during the summer) writes:

Speaking as a short guy (163cm/5'4") (who has dated both some pretty big women, and outside his ethnic group - twice big women outside his ethnic group), I have been turned down expressly for being too short. The click was there, but I just wasn't tall enough. One woman I did date who was taller than me was concerned…

Autism $peaks supports research into identifying autism in utero. I challenge you to find an alternative explanation to eugenics.

House understands human interaction - he just doesn't give a sh*t. That doesn't make him an Aspie - it makes him an **sehole.

No, Sherlock is not an Aspie either.