Neopopulas
Neopopulas
Neopopulas

the Protestant work ethic brought to you by my ancestors!

Why did you call Pluto a planet in the headline, if the whole point of the video was that Pluto is not a planet?

You HAVE to be a troll. Just HAVE to be. Or you're insane and living in a very irregularly shaped mound of mud and straw.

In a way, it's not that they're using it to mean the opposite; they're using it as an emphasizing filler. People who are misusing it (and yes, whatever LizTaylorsEarrings or Fucking Webster's says, it is wrong) aren't intending to convey either meaning. Their use of it could just as easily be "really", "totally" or

I have a feeling if the two of us just sat down an riffed on ideas with an artist bringing them to life we'd have a hit webcomic.

I'm also imagining Frodowraith dragging this large broadsword behind him because it is too heavy to pick up.

And a little Nazgul dragon about the size of a VW Bug. That breaths smoke rings like Baby Godzilla.

He actually was right on the path for it.

Because the ending that is being proposed is too complicated and entirely too dark for twelve year olds (the intended audience). We live in a culture where the line between childhood and adulthood has been erased. This is, in itself, not terrible. But it has been erased in the favor of adults, so that they never have

And what made it MOST interesting is that Frodo lost. He gave in. He would have been a ringwraith.

He shivered. "When's summer here?"

Trying to get my point across about the relationship between the MPAA and a filmmaker and it's connection to freedom of speech in plain terms is exhausting, so instead I'm going to tell a story.
A man displays his finished painting in a public square to a crowd made up of children, teenagers and adults. The painting

No. STar Trek Into Darkness was not a "bad" movie. You just had high expectations.
A lot of folks are upset that it wasn't a script that would put "City on the Edge of Forever" to shame. Please. Unrealistically high expectations unrealized is not the same thing as a "bad" movie. As a critic, you can say whatever you

CLEARLY #1

Convention attendees are not insensate animals. You imply that we can't expect people to control themselves when presented with provocative stimuli. This is exactly the same sort of twisted, bullshit reasoning that morally bankrupt theocrats use to justify forcing women into burqas in fundamentalist Islamic states. It

I know you are going to get a lot of shit for this but you are right. You can't deny human nature. Sorry but it ain't going to happen and if you dress up like Molotov Cocktease and then complain about the uncomfortable feeling of eyes upon you, then I don't think that type of costume is for you.

I totally get it.

Any intelligent rebuttal about anything I said would be very welcome. Where is anything I said not true? Specifically, mind.

Hmm. I guess this is supposed to be striking a blow for feminism. You bust out some 3rd wave feminist terms here to make your case. However, I'm about to drop another layer of feminism on you.