Avatar, to me, has been the only movie WORTH 3D, because its pure spectacle. 3D doesn't seem, to me, to make a movie BETTER to watch, or more interesting. Its all visuals, and if your movie is JUST about visuals, then maybe 3D is for you. But ultimately, if thats all you have, then its probably not worth it anyway.

So that counts for just watching from the street AND the phone taps? I'd assume that listening to conversations would be considered private. I do however know that some states have a rule that say BOTH participants have to be aware they are being recorded, while some only need one. Which means so long as one person…

I'm not an American, or an expert on American law but i was always under the impression you needed a warrant to do things like tap phones and follow or stake out a house. Basically anything that involves following or watching people required a warrant or at least just cause or some kind. Someone telling you that you…

And thats a problem... why? I'll pay her for good content.. Whats wrong with that?

Sounds like Dresden files to me.

I'm not sure if its because we're so small, or if this is really that huge a news.. but this actually got reported on my local news..

I just can't understand people who say they 'forgot' X was there "Oh i just FORGOT the animal who depends on me for life was in the car' Why even TAKE it with you if you're going to leave in the car. I just don't understand at all..

My question would be, why render, in 3D a theatre (the virtual representations of friends and so on) when you could just watch the show in direct-to-eyeball 3D. For me, i don't see many movies at the theatre because i don't care for the overpriced tickets and iffy conditions of seats and screens. I would MUCH rather…

The thing is you can get a toaster that makes perfect toast, its just way too expensive and has to be maintained. Something i think you would do with a brain implant.

Because how else are they going to make a wink-wink-nudge-nudge swallowing reference?

Superman never really interested me. His powers, his purpose, its kinda boring. Clark Kent is much more interesting. I'm always more interested in stories that focus on Kent more than superman punching things.

WAIT, ADAM BALDWIN IS ON THIS SHOW?

Welp, might as well go and watch that episode now.

I hear rumors Samsung(maybe?) are working on a camera that always records in landscape no matter what way you hold your phone. Praise be the day.

Because this won't further encourage piracy AT ALL.

How can you 'read around' DUNE, and why would you even want to? I can SORT of understand reading the prequels, though you would lose a lot in doing so, but the sequels to DUNE are MORE complex, larger and build entirely on the ones before it. If you don't read DUNE, the sequels are nonsense. I can't imagine anyone…

It does, he's a good actor and its a shame to not see him in more things.

And really, if he wasn't happy (for whatever reason) its good he left, because his performance would suffer and it wouldn't be good for anyone.

I mean its all 'he said they did X' and 'he said they said Y'. Since no one else seems to be saying it and there is no evidence, its all just him saying people did and said things.

While i missed some of them (and got Ramsey Snow back in place, so its okay) i was glad to see some of them go. It wasn't all bad.