You obviously have no reading comprehension skills in addition to your antisocial behavior. As I said, I don't care if you don't like kids. Go cry into a pillow. What I do care about is whether or not you assault a child. And I abso-fucking-lutely will become unreasonable in a hurry if you assault my child. The first…

You are typing a bunch of bullshit like anything about assaulting a child is reasonable. There is no circumstance where assaulting anyone is reasonable, especially a child. If you don't like children, I don't care, deal with it, or get a therapist and figure out why your parents didn't love you. You are the human…

Well I don't let my child run up and down an aisle. That's neither here nor there really. The point is that you are admitting to having assaulted a child. The most vulnerable and innocent members of humanity. Nothing in the world justifies that under any circumstance. If I saw you do that to any kid I'd probably…

I don't condone bad behavior from anyone, including children, but if you did that to my kid I guarantee the plane would be landing because I would beat you within an inch of your life.

At what point does one decide that it's better to have say... 10 f-16s/15s/Av-8s vs one new fighter? I mean, this thing is more capable and all but I wonder how many older fighters each one of these equals price wise. Maybe re-activate some old squadrons and just overwhelm with "pretty good" quantity vs a hand full…

Kinja won't let me edit, but I meant to say that *small* or *typical* bullets fired at high angles generally do not maintain lethal energy. I would say a .308 is heavier than average.

The maximum angle for max range is going to be less than 45 degrees and somewhere closer to 30. The reason being is aerodynamic drag.

Looks like my post really made you feel like shit. Don't worry kid, you live and learn.

I live in Italy and I own a Camaro. Everyone asks me if it is a Mustang.

Some leaked footage from an emergency board meeting at Porsche. They're talking about the Z06

I refuse to believe that any part of this post is serious.

Them Sears white letter tires are worth every penny!

Pretty sure you got some bad info about the throttle bodies. Do you have a source for that?
I've never heard anything other than the drive trains being exactly identical. I'm talking about the 86/87 intercooled cars. The TB is 58 mm. Even if they weren't, going from a stock TB to a 62 or even a 70 nets no gains even…

Haha, that's funny. Mine is white. I get some interesting comments too.

You are closer to correct than I was. My mistake, I was going from memory. Total GN production was closer to 30k for all years combined including the non intercooled (pre 86) cars. They made 20k GNs in 87. I was also off on the T type count apparently: http://www.gnttype.org/general/produc…

I was bringing up a typical example, actually a slow one. Most modded turbo Buicks are in the 10s. If we are going to talk about what's possible with a stock block then there's this :

All that motor? It's a 3.8 V6, and it was underrated. Second, comparing new cars to old cars is dumb. You know what else made less power stock than a focus? A Ferrari 308.
Third, the GN is a chip, wastegate adjustment, and some good fuel away from low 12s.
I ran a 7.2 @ 95 in the 1/8th on a stock longblock (stock heads,…

Good point Jim. It's almost as if he was searching for one that was jacked up in the back with a Calvin sticker on it but settled for this pic

If you mean a regal with GN badging but no turbo 6, then yes, fake, but the car could be had in regal trim. They were called T types or Turbo Ts (86 and 87 respectively) and they are actually much more rare than Grand Nationals. Exactly the same as a GN mechanically but with virtually any Regal trim option. There are…

Glad to see that two Turbo Buicks made the list (the 89 TTA essentially has a GN drivetrain)
And yeah, it's not a "Trans Am Turbo" it's a Turbo Trans Am. Only 1555 made. Came with the 1LE brakes and suspension too.