You think wrong. Other vehicles in that segment from a wide variety of manufacturers were suffering greatly due to low quality/reliability ratings

I can clear all this up. Just read my lack of blog and you'll find out that I don't like Musk and think his cars lack style. Pontiac deserved to die as did Saturn (I never met a Pontiac that I liked). And Millenials can afford cars, they're just environmental snobs who refuse to buy new electric (and battery…

Spoken as if by a person who never owned a G6.

NO!!!!

Saying that you were just tossing out a generalized comment is ignorant and stupid. You deserve the screams of people who think you're childish.

The difference between purchasing a car and the average yearly income is greater than any other time after WWII. Not you, not I, are able to claim this from our youth.

I'm a Gen X. I have a smart phone. I own a PS3. I use Netflix. I cannot afford a car. There is a massive difference between a $600/year (when you average out how much you pay versus time between replacements) and $2000/year budget ($500/year insurance, $5000 beater (i.e. Acura EL 1.7 from '98), fuel and…

Are you kidding me? There's a large difference between the cost of a car and communication technology. Let's not forget that Baby Boomers and Gen X also have cable bills and cell phones.

Find out which car is their's and block it in in an "acceptable" manner.

I don't believe you. I mean, that I don't believe that you are factually knowledgeable about anything.

You didn't read the article, did you?

This needs to be clarified, that's what. So here goes... "Michael Fischer's dealership is awful". Better now?

Rustom collected the first payment so it makes sense for him to go back to them. After all, they could sell the loan to 100 different companies without telling him. Take a look at one of the root causes of the 2008 financial meltdown.

This is Jalopnik and not Computenik. That's why computer code should be avoided in the comments. We're car fans, not programming fans.

"And", "Or"? What is this? Chinese?

Just like last time! What? You don't want to pay taxes? Then don't live and you won't have to pay! It's just that simple!

Stop being a fan boy and think. I used the '60's as an example because the power was high and the fuel efficiency poor then the power dropped in the '70's and the fuel efficiency was better. This is a pattern that's repeated until recently when automakers have been given more time to ensure fuel efficiency standards.

Try checking out North American engines from the late '60's. Notably not even Honda can get 100 HP/l with modern fuel efficiency legislation. They had to drop the S2000 down to 180 HP while boosting displacement by 0.2L.

Sure, if you want to throw fuel efficiency out the window.

I never though I'd see Japanese porn on Jalopnik.