That looks like a hollywood car you’d see in a sci-fi flick in the early to mid 90s.

Because the people who would buy the hypothetical worthy namesake, that the company has no intention of making, wouldn’t really care what it was named as long as it embodied... something worthwhile, as long as it was the opposite of what this is.

The problem with taxes derived from a specific source with the “intention” of using them for a specific purpose is that as soon as money is needed somewhere else for something (useful or not) the whole scheme doesn’t matter.

I will remain cynical.  There hasn’t been enough revealed yet to let us know how EA is going to screw this up.  There’s still time.

The outstanding examples will be preserved, the more generic derivatives that exist because someone loved them for sentimental or nostalgic reasons will rust away at a junkyard or a barn.  It’s the circle of life.

It’s good to reward a company trying to make an honest effort to be better.

There’s an emotional difference though. People still like to think game companies have their customers’ best interests at heart. While it’s true that some of them very well might, there’s a raft of evidence that some companies are only interested in extracting as much money from customer’s wallets as they can. When…

It’ll be interesting to see how it plays mechanically, and how they’ve translated the idea that even if they don’t start that way, pretty much most games of Paranoia end up in the Zap mode playstyle around the table.

The “anonymous” part is even better. It’s not like it’s necessarily a large sample size. How many female employees are conceiving each year and opting in to use the app? It’s not that hard to combine information already known to the company (such as who took maternity leave) and then look back at the “anonymous” data…

Maybe.  But all those flag guidelines are just suggestions anyway.

Well, it probably makes somebody feel better that the meat is “locally” sourced.

They posted a 2nd update on the page Bill linked above.

They posted a 2nd update on the page Bill linked above.

Twitter harassment?

I don’t think the American government mandated any changes to those products, which would have been censorship.

A majority actually did not vote for Trump. 62,980,160 people voted for Trump. 65,845,063 voted for Clinton.

It could have survived a lot of that if the release date had been 6 months earlier, or maybe 6 months later.

With still having friendly fire in the game, I wonder if they still have the mechanic where you can throw the enemy into a group and knock over everyone, including your co-op partner.

Technically, they probably are, having announced two other titles.

Microsoft has a lot of problems with letting certain acquisitions do their own things, whether it’s a good business strategy or not.