Naravara
Naravara
Naravara

Misogynistic douches aren't exactly well known for having an over-abundance of empathy.

If you don't mind my asking, though, if you have a strong preference for dating within your own culture, why did you opt for a more open free-for-all site like OKCupid rather than something more focused like JDate?

You're dealing with an adverse selection problem here. Most Indian guys have social pressure (of varying levels) to date within their culture. OKCupid, Match, etc. have predominantly White user-bases. The very fact that they're on there rather than an Indian dating site like Shaadi is pre-selecting for people who

It's not 1:1. It's more like 10 gamers' fluff is 1's treasure.

You can be busy, but that doesn't mean an entire medium has to bend to your will.

Portal takes place in first-person. You have a gun that you shoot things with. It has platforming elements, but the primary means of interacting with the world is shooting things in first-person. First-Person Shooter.

If you and I are making a game, and we want to make a FPS, but also want to have a story with a sympathetic character

You're missing the point. You're talking about "altering" gameplay or "altering" story as if these are discrete, pre-made parts being welded together. That's now how it works. The entire game is being designed with these gaps in thinking in mind. They didn't think properly about marrying your interaction with the

I don't get this logic. The story wasn't something that got plucked out of the ether. The game designers wrote the story with the game mechanics in mind. Yes the story would have been different from what you got, but it's not being "altered," it's being written better. It's better since the protagonist's sole mode of

Mentioning ME3 on a top-10 list is an invitation to turn your comment section to shit.

You guys put way too much stock in backlash. The trouble with microtransactions is that that crap isn't any fun. It works for crappy iOS games because it's low-investment junk that people play while they poop. 90% of people aren't paying anything for it and they just subsist on the 10% of whales who do sink their

Good art direction with limited hardware >>>> boring art direction with fantastic hardware.

Eh. Honestly, not a single one of those games stirred anything in me. Would you honestly look at anything in that lineup and tell yourself your life is poorer for not having had the opportunity to play it? The only justification is that you sank the cost into a PS4 so you might as well play stuff on the new shiny

From a business standpoint, XBox was a huge bet that lost MS a lot of money. Everyone knew it was going to lose a lot of money, they treated it like a large down-payment to get penetration into the industry.

. . . I like 3rd person cover shooters. As games they're fun. The muscle-bound, thick-necked, grimdark world where everything is brown and gray can go, though. And I believe CliffyB himself says he's annoyed at how pervasive that style has become.

He looks so proud of himself. . . smug bastard.

PC gaming is only cheaper if you satisfy two conditions.

1.) You have the time to build it yourself and you're willing to buy a cheap rig that's merely as good as the current consoles on the market at best.
Moreover, if you're a gear-head the temptation will be strong to get just a little bit more RAM and just a

"Crap out kids?" Kids don't come out that hole genius. This nonsense you just posted on the other hand . . .

Revenues =/= profits. Taking in more money doesn't mean anything if all the extra money goes into supporting an event that's getting larger.

You can't just brush aside the difference between a 64 bit x86 processor and PPC chip like its nothing. That's like asking if squash and tennis are really such different games aside from the fact that the rulesets are completely different.

I haven't laughed at one of those THIS IS ____ memes in a long long time. Well played.