OH GOD WHAT DO YOU SEARCH TO FIND GIFS LIKE THESE?!! LMAO
OH GOD WHAT DO YOU SEARCH TO FIND GIFS LIKE THESE?!! LMAO
At least you're safe from alien invasions.
My nightstand is littered with water glasses. It's like the house from Signs.
Always down so you can just grab by the handle, and separate them so they're easier to put away (forks in one slot, spoons in another, etc.).
I made a point of looking up a dubious claim on the Internet and then sharing that it was wrong and I had an earful on and off for days over it. Not that she was wrong but that I did not trust her on her word. *grin*
That is a constant issue with my wife/kids and myself. Knives/forks/spoons go down...I have the scars to back me up on this. Additionally, when you grab utensil, you have a good chance of grabbing the part you actually put in your mouth...
Plus then you have to pick up the business end of that fork with your hands, which have been who knows where and then everyone eats your hand-germs afterwards.
Nope. Dishwashers save water and electricity. Not to mention my previous, precious time and my soft hands.
Silverware up or down?
When I first started living with my girlfriend (now wife), I stabbed myself a couple times because she left knives and forks pointy ends up. If that's what's going on here, I cannot abide.
I use the upper rack instruction method all the time!After three months without a dishwasher this year, I was overjoyed when I could afford a new one and so I did read the manual.
Never, ever, EVER, use the Internet to prove your wife wrong.
There's no pattern for I eat 12 tiny bowls of granola a day and my girlfriend gets a glass of something drinks it all, puts the glass down wherever she is at that moment and then forgets about it so next time she has to get another glass and by the end of the day there are no more glasses and we have to conduct a room…
Civil trial level of proof is preponderance of evidence, which basically means the judge/jury believes the defendant is at least 50% guilty. Beyond a reasonable doubt is more like 75-80% guilty.
I don't think that it sets up unreasonable expectations. If you get tested regularly like you should, the next step of making sure you don't infect anyone else should be VERY easy for anyone who has ANY moral fiber.
Can we just make $900 000 the standard fine on men who "whoopsie no condom even though you told me four times and didn't consent to sex without one, and I even went as far as to watch you put it on, and you horrible fuck snuck it off when I wasn't looking..."
"...she asked him to wear a condom and he agreed, but then suddenly he wasn't wearing a condom and 'it was too late.'"
Well, he'd deserve an assault conviction for not using a condom when she asked him to, regardless of the herpes. I believe that counts as rape.
Maybe because the jury thought there was some kind of onus on her to be absolutely certain that he was STD-free before having sex with him, and that by consenting to sexual activity with someone you are by default partially responsible for whatever the outcome may be. :/
How the fuck is it even 25% her fault? What in the flying fuck?