MrsMeows
MezzoMeows
MrsMeows

I would laugh in a man's face if he seriously asked me if I had email.

An therein lies the stupidity.

Why can't we just call vegan leather what it actually is? It's vinyl/"pleather."

This is why we need feminism. For exactly this reason.

This caption is why I love the title of DB and Amal, because who is Clooney really? What has he done for society except be hot and give us silly movies like "Oceans 11"?

SPOILERS.

"Kat Dennings and Josh Groban are a couple."

You shut your mouth with that right now. Don't you dare compare a goddess to a Goopy.

it's pronounced "bouquet"!!

It's not the joke that annoys me. It's that he assumes that she hasn't heard that sort of thing a thousand times before.

Do a lot of bartenders feel that way? I don't like beer, I always have wine at home, so I usually order fancy cocktails when I go out. I mean, I'm paying for them, I pay a premium for them, should I feel guilty about ordering them? I always tip well.

While I get the spirit of OP's post, I think your point is an important distinction too.

Fair meta point and fair as food for thought. But, I think it's tough to argue that you forfeit being able to credibly decry the history of racism in this country because you happen to own a pair of Nikes.

While you raise some good points, the fact is, all historical periods have a horrible dark side. So if you feel that plantation houses should only serve as museums to remind people of slavery, does that mean that you feel that the Vatican should stop operating as the HQ of Catholicism, and only serve to remind us of

If I knew that anything of mine was being made with slave labour, as in actually made by people making no money and who were owned by other people, I would throw it away.

"The models are dressed just like high society women of the pre-Civil War South — if you replaced every one of their items of clothing with a different item of clothing."

For maximum authenticity, the clothing shown is actually made with slave labor in Bangledesh.

I was bartending a shift for my restaurant's fifth anniversary when three uppity college girls came in and preceded to order elaborate, handcrafted cocktails all night. They were mostly just hanging out to win some of the prizes for our company's anniversary celebration plus snag free food. I mean, they're college

How would you prefer she word it? She's not denying that she (like every other human being on the planet) has a point of view, she's saying her methodology in exploring the issue has been subjected to academic scrutiny. It's really the best guarantee of non-bias we can get.

She isn't declaring her own neutrality, but rather the neutrality of the process. Academic vetting of survey-based research methods is intense and frustratingly exacting. It is a solid bulwark about claims against the construction of her research design and is not offered as a direct defense of her analysis of