Which ones?
Which ones?
How did he legitimize them with that? He stated that Russia is telling its constituents a different story than what we’re being told but does not come to a conclusion one way or the other about who is accurate. Simply that they’re reporting something different. I’d prefer another party confirming but the only people…
Because it’s relevant to see what Russian media says about the strike (propaganda or not). It certainly doesn’t read like an endorsement to me.
Says who?
I seen it almost as a rushed response just so Trump could say he did some kind of military action. And his supporters will eat it up.
I’m going err on the side that doesn’t involve killing human beings, but instead destroys military equipment used for the prior stated purpose.
“God, i just wanna read the comment section. Please spare me from the lag of next article.”
As someone who is generally anti-launching missiles at sovereign nations and also anti-gassing innocent civilians, what is the correct moral stance here? I’m kind of thinking providing a disincentive to using chemical weapons is... good?
“I Call On All Civilized Nations To Join Us In Seeking To End This Infinitely Scrolling Blog Disaster”
“treat that stephen colbert clip as gospel” would that be the Gospel According to John Oliver?
Man, I’m glad I’m not an alcoholic.
The administration showed its hand. Reacting to an account means there surely must be some truth there.
Stop criticizing the police. You’ll hurt morale.
“Not the views of DHS or USCIS.”
This gave me an idea for how to doctor balls without having anything on the pitcher. Put some pine tar on the chest protector and have the catch tap the ball on it before throwing it back. Going to keep this idea in my back pocket for when I have kids and I start taking coaching little league way too seriously.
Exactly what crime is that? There are no laws that say you must agree with the policy of your employer. This would be a First Amendment issue if they tried to stifle the account.
Twitter just filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security and US Customs and Border Protection over…
Cops covering for other cops?
Maybe in the initial “what is this foreign new thing in mah world meaaahhh” stages, but once that wears off it’s not like people go around digging potholes or tearing up railroad tracks. Or shooting pipelines, which go through exactly that kind of territory.