But really Top Gear has been in Simpsons for years.

Top Gear always seemed to choose places when it went overseas that Britain really didn’t have an analogue for. If I had to guess, this was intentional. In the U.S. they have gone to the southwest twice, across Florida and the deep south, and up Appalachia to NYC. None of those places exist in essence in Britain. New…

From the article:

Counterpoint: This looks dope.

Swing and a miss!

Hail as though we might, even God couldn’t hit it out of the park tonight.

A flash was certainly used, and in front of the animals, just not directly from the camera by the looks of it.

Yeah, it’s all about keeping brown people out. That’s why the Chicken Tikki Masala is the national dish.

So, 52% of the British electorate are virulently racist nativists. Good to know.

No. It’s annoying and makes the one doing the judging look like an ass.

I’m just imagining how much easier lighting will be. Aside from the wheels it doesn’t require any and that saves a huge amount of time.

Sounds like the crew’s relationship is on the rocks.

Ford hasn’t done this yet, but the ACO still allowed them to enter the competition.

In previous GT versions one had complete control over the camera settings, including choosing a focal length for the “lens” between like 12mm and 200mm.

This is a bad take.

This is obviously during the instal/removal of the shade. Not it’s final position.

You know what they awoke in the darkness.

Yes. That is how it is measured.

Be ware of delving too greedily and too deep.

It was being used in a manner outside its design specifications. It failed. A professional would know the difference. These are professional devices. A steady-cam system normally runs $20k+. It’s not for someone on a trade show floor. The dude trying out the gear is an idiot and the guy selling the gear is an idiot.…