If you want to have a weepy circle jerk, you are more than welcome to do it elsewhere. Not in my threads, however. I don't abide circle jerking or derailing.

Sadly, I doubt he even knows what that purpose is. He will, in time. Ohhh, will he ever. I just hope he's really into twitter so we can all watch it go down.

Also, fair warning, but ginmar is a long time troll who likes to derail. I don't abide him in my threads anymore, and that includes his responses to others. Dismiss him or I'll have to dismiss your comments to get rid of them.

You can pick any time you want in American history, that was just my suggestion. That risk of being drafted was so huge and so many people were drafted by the end of it that they had to come up with new rules to the draft so that you MIGHT be excused if you were the last male in your family. I can't recall the…

OK then, I have a question. Would you rather have been a man or woman, historically? Lets stick with American history for this, keep it short and simple. How would you like to be a man in the 1930's?

You are the one that started this round of oppression olympics. I don't care what the reasons are that women didn't fight in wars or die in coal mines. The cold hard fact is that women were not subjected to these harsh realities while men were. You can call it sexism against women all you want, at the end of the day,…

Because feminism, as I've been told, is about being able to make the choices you want for yourself. If some loaded guy wants to hook up with a poor but hot girl and she likes the arrangement, then why exactly is Doug going on and on about how creepy it is.

Yeah, as of this year, and I seem to recall quite a bit of push back from those same groups about being required to register for selective service. Furthermore, I'll take that with a huge grain of salt until wartime and workplace deaths get closer to 50/50.

Better to be a valued object than one to be disposed of when your use has run out. Or would you rather switch places with men so that you may die in war or on the job by the ship load?

I dunno, why not? If you have a specific set of things you are looking for in a mate, then who are you to begrudge him? It doesn't sound very feminist to me.

I say go for it. If you REALLY want to compete in athletic sports with men, go right ahead. I don't see it working out the way you might hope, however.

Does anyone else find it ironic that feminists are the only people, the ONLY people, that find men's rights offensive? Its like some kind of mantra that you guys have to repeat so that you'll keep believing it. Its up there with the "but don't forget, women have it worse" line of thinking.

So, you have proof that her husband is abusing and manipulating her? That would seem to fly in the face of what she writes, but go ahead and post it.

Look guy, every bit that I've read on this makes it seem like both she and her husband enjoy the lifestyle they have. It does sound ignorant for someone to put into their book that their lifestyle should work for everyone, but guess what? You don't have to marry a meat head or even buy her book. She's got every right…

She seems happy to me. I don't think I would be happy in either role of that relationship, but there are plenty of people who are.

I thought that feminism was about accepting the choices women make? She clearly enjoys being animal fucked by a brute, and there are clearly plenty of women like her who agree.

You could have saved yourself the time and just said "patriarchy lol."

So the only response to a pic full of quotes is that I'm "stupider."

Interesting. So what a group says might not actually mesh with what they do, that's what you're saying?

Maybe you should actually read those articles? Or do you prefer to remain misinformed when you go picking out your labels?