I always take a quick stroll through the entire market first.

"We, the undersigned, who are a group of student Muslim brothers and sisters, ask the cultural and media branch of the judiciary to prosecute Leyla Hatami for her sinful act of kissing a strange man in public . . .

Although the possibility hadn't occurred to me until you mentioned it, it does seem plausible.

Yes, but you remember her hubby? Former POTUS? White and male? They basically did the same thing to him.

Oh, you ain't seen nothin' yet.

Sure, it's a fair question. We'd be asking about it if she were a man [1].

It's a cart/horse (or if you prefer, chicken/egg) thing.

Harry Reid back in the day?

I don't know your dad obviously, but if does/says all this crappy stuff when he's drinking, then the problem might be that he's a drunk. If true, that certainly doesn't make it any better, but it might give some perspective.

People, we have to institute a rule:

Not to overstate the obvious, but surely by this time, someone has sat this poor fool down and pointed out that men who really aren't into anal sex as much as he claims not to be into it don't spend weeks at a time describing—in great detail—what they imagine someone fucking them in the ass must be like.

If it's any consolation, George Washington (a freemason) would have gotten the stink-eye too.

Ms. Burnett should also be on the list you need to look at (along with, e.g., Ann Richards, Molly Ivins, Bill Hicks, Dwight Eisenhower, Patricia Highsmith, Robert Rauschenberg, LBJ, Karen Silkwood, Horton Foote, Denton Cooley and Michael DeBakey, Babe Didrikson Zaharias, Jim Thompson, Jim Bowie, Paul Chu, Larry…

Does anyone know offhand what the point of the egg white is in the Pink Lady?

Uh, isn't this one of banks that cost us a cool trillion in taxpayers' money to bail out? Including the taxes paid by folks in the porn industry?

It's not simply that Republicans have wasted the time and resources of the people of Louisiana is promulgating this claptrap.

Actually, the letter says:

An important point is that THE TROOP ITSELF and their parents and the church—really, everyone who's directly affected by this decision—have no problem with the guy.

How does this work exactly? Can I simply proclaim that everyone who reads this comment has to come here right now and clean my apartment, or is it limited to claiming that they can't ever sue me?

Are you aware that if you grow heart cells in a petri dish, they will beat?