Aren’t all good things in one’s benefit? Do good so you feel good etc... etc...something like that.

What’s that you say? Is this car from the 80's? Nope. 1993 Pontiac Sunbird convertible. This is the worst car ever. Did it drive like an absolute turd? Yep! Sure did. Was it horrible unreliable? check. Did the windows get stuck up/down? Aye. Worst. Car. Ever.

But ghosts!

I agree with you regarding the the premise of the article, mobile land nukes plus the whole SLBMs make it kind of moot etc... but call it what it is, a bad hypothesis and address that. Jumping to Russia bashing in a post that doesn’t have any weakens your position.

In my limited riding experience (taking the class and getting my license 10 years ago), I’d have to agree. Seems like he had plenty of time to turn to avoid. SIPDE!

Still need to check your mirrors and blind spots for a legit lane change. The biker has some fault, but the majority falls on the car. Its making the lane change and it’s their responsibility to make sure they can do so safely.

I’m going to pass on the whole starting a nuke war/wwIII. I’d very much prefer to be not dead.

Where does the Russian bashing come into this post? Seems, if anything, to rationalize Russians actions a bit more by bringing insight to US actions. Zero Russia bashing detected there.

Here here. I thought I was average to slightly above the layman. But if this is a layman’s take on engines I am pretty sure my 5 year old son is slightly above layman as well.

Couldn’t they just get Darpa to create some kind of signal jamming/theft that would allow them to take over civilian drones? Admittedly, I’m armchair spit-balling here, but it seems like civilian drones wouldn’t have a lot of defenses against that type of countermeasure.

Don’t forget the 3,500 altitude drone...

Steve Bannon worked at Goldman Sachs

I would love to see recent data, but I haven’t been able to find anything either. And that’s my point, one cannot make a statement either way on the use of firearms for defense/gun violence in general as there is almost no recent data out there. 25-30 year old data may be relevant, but a lot of things have changed…

If it was one guy, that would be fine (maybe), but NY/NJ/CT driving means there are probably 10 other guys doing this right behind him. Which is (1) a dick move and (2) slows down the other lane of travel. So the 1-10 guy[s] need to get somewhere 20 seconds faster and thus causes the whole roadway to get clogged and…

They do this shit on the Beltway in DC, but instead of going from the lane next to the exit lane, they go across 2 or 3 lanes of traffic. It’s amazing in its complete dickishness. Literally stop in the 2nd lane in from the left on a 4 lane road to make the exit lane at the last second.

they zoom past lots of open spots to get as far ahead in the line as possible

Lol. Cute. The troll is calling me one. Try harder next time sweet heart.

Chill dude. You seem a bit defensive. I simply asked for statistical evidence to back up you’re claims. Can you imagine? Evidence? And yes I understand that statistics are groups of anecdotes, but sample size of 3 is enough to tell you precisely nothing.

Oh no “fuckstick”! I’m so impressed with your mud slinging. No one has ever said that before. You’re a genius! Someone call NASA!

I grew up atheist and it always struck me how it was somehow “better” to be good in order to get into heaven (seems rather selfish to me) than to be good for the sake of doing what it right.