Pushing a Single Player Game that hard may make sense for an Indie Studio who’d be crushed by a game’s failure. Not so much for a Major Studio.

Simple: There’s more money to be made with a hit of a Game as a Service than there with a hit of a Single Player Game.

No Magical Girl Series?

Yes. Yes.

the main character just standing there in an idle animation

Getting flashbacks to “ Here’s this Giant Enemy Crab “ when the article opens about this being a serious and dramatic moment in the game and then mood whiplashes to “ Well, king-dad’s a zombie “

if it’s following the game lore

More concerned about what he says than how he says it.

“ I don’t care so no one else should! “ 

You’d think that in over a century humanity would have found a more advanced solution to a population crisis than “ Just Fuck More “

Something that doesn’t look ultra realistic? I’m in!

Surprised they didn’t price it $199 US Dollars

Now see; the developers are only paid to ensure the system works.

The response from the community has been negative.

They are making a 3D Version of Neopets — if you like NFTs.

5 Whole Dollars. The Horror.

It’s not just the age. It the question of why someone would watch a stream or longplay of a game they’d want to play spoiler-free and be surprised by spoilers.

*Sis, and content creator/domestic abuse survivor

Besides it never being a good idea to speak down to your audience, that term in particular has racist/classist origins.

Non-content creators in the peanut gallery