MisterMoon
Mister_Moon
MisterMoon

the rears do so little of the work that drums are fine.

I'm going out on a limb here, but I'd say just you.

When I am Running Things, cars with two conflicting animal names will be forbidden.

I throw these in first thing - they're far from heirloom quality, but they've been useful on more than one occasion.

I once bought a Fiat.

Ah. The "Cousin Eddie" model. Very nice.

I'm an Eagle Scout and I've struggled with that problem myself when it comes to whether I'll register my son in Scouting. I decided that the good (see above) far outweighs the bad. There is simply no comparable organization. As long as you find a troop and a leader that shades your values, it will be fine. I knew gay

That's a whole lotta narcissism, don't you think?

A car that has a known service history is better than gambling on a used car that doesn't. The owned the car that long, they knew its history, they kept things going.

A Riv can be modified to be pretty awesome. That is not such a modification, so between the stock and the pseudo-Tucker I'd take the stock. Not that a ' 71 Riviera would be my first choice. The '65 is more to my taste.

Nice troll bait.

Cool, so you just have to carry a wooden pallet with you everywhere.

I spent several years restoring a "Free" 1965 Beetle, I drove it once on GA 400 and even with a highly modified engine making nearly triple the horsepower of the stock plant, I felt like I was going to die. I quickly sold the car at a show for close to break even since I decided there was no way to enjoy it in the

Final-gen Buick Riviera: last gasp of the American personal luxury car, but boy did it go out with a bang. Great unabashedly 'Murrican looks and size, but with a blown V6 that could still get out of its own way.

Sooooo, it's a Camaro now?

The most humorous moment of those commercials: "Trabant 601. Schnell." lol

Because England is 50,000 square miles with 61 million people living in it (1,220 people/sqmi). The United States is 3,800,000 square miles with 313 million people living in it (82.3 people/sqmi). With 15 times the average population density, it's 15 times more cost-effective to invest in public transit options for