States can’t make laws that overrule federal rulings. This is a federal issue. If someone sues the state for passing a law in contravention of federal law, the State law will fail to pass constitutional muster. That’s not enough to overturn Roe. You’d have to sue based on the actual law, not because a state passed…

I paired my Hillary pantsuit T Shirt with an actual pantsuit. Lady at the polling place had to ask me to turn my Hillary tote around which is legit and the law but what good is it doing? LOOK AT ME.

Yeah, when you don’t remember doing this but you’re all, “Yep, sounds like me.” That is not a good sign of your overall character.

Maybe you’re an asshole?

to me this screams “nameless stylist hates her fucking job and is laughing her ass off”

“Do you really think that Hillary Clinton is debate-prepping for three or four days. Hillary Clinton is resting, okay?”

Hey, I put real thought into my opinion/comment - you can disagree, but that doesn’t make ME the troll

Seems to me like you’re just willfully disregarding anything that might contradict your preconceived biases.

You could bring up the most unsavory, reprehensible people our society has to offer. I still don’t think it warrants making our criminal justice system more draconian.

Oh thank God, I was just thinking about how too little power the carceral state already has and how there’s just too much emphasis in our system on restorative justice that centers the victims in any way rather than just being punitive for the sake of being punitive. CA to the rescue yet again!

I’m really conflicted about this. I think mandatory sentences are generally a terrible idea. I also think judges are going to continue to treat sexual assault as a harmless little non-crime in which the perpetrators are the true victims as long as they’re legally allowed to do so. I’m honestly not sure which is the…

No no no no no this is not how things get better. Goddamnit.

This is an example of a bad set of facts, and public outrage in search of a target, leading to a bad law.

Oh so THAT’S what it’s called!! haha, I suffer from this almost constantly. It’s usually on big ticket items, though. For example, I decided that I needed to replace my aging Malibu. I knew that I could afford a small car payment (I was being realistic) and as I was saving up I started doing research. I found the…

jfc. It’s looks like if you tried to pee in the ocean in that thing the piss would shoot up the front, squirt out your cleavage, and hit you in the face.

“And I was very, very surprised. In almost every instance, and I could tell — I’m pretty good with the body language — I could tell they were not happy,”

Man ok but I think that ensemble is dope as hell.

Yeah— it basically means we can’t summarily throw him in jail on the basis of 50+ accusations. He is entitled to a trial. He is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt from ANYONE else.

protip: innocent until proven guilty only matters in a court of law. You have 50+ women coming forward accusing you of rape, yeah i’m calling you a guilty motherfucker and as long as I don’t publish it and claim it as fact you can’t do shit. Deal with it.

I don’t think this necessarily offers hope for humanity, but I wouldn’t say it’s just basic decency for a guy who went to the school expecting to be fawned over by excited kids to instead sit down with a lonely, awkward boy who probably didn’t even know who he was.